Skip to content

Changing Bounds in u-Substitution

Run the Changing Bounds MicroSim Fullscreen
Edit with the p5.js Editor

About This MicroSim

When you use u-substitution on a definite integral, you have a choice: either substitute back to x after finding the antiderivative, or change the bounds so you never have to back-substitute at all. This MicroSim visualizes that second approach -- and shows you why it works geometrically.

The key idea is that the substitution \(u = g(x)\) maps the interval \([a, b]\) in the x-domain to the interval \([g(a), g(b)]\) in the u-domain, and the shaded areas under both curves are exactly equal:

\[\int_a^b f(g(x)) \cdot g'(x)\, dx = \int_{g(a)}^{g(b)} f(u)\, du\]

Delta Moment

"So instead of backtracking to x after all that substitution work, I can just update my start and end points? That's like changing my GPS coordinates instead of retracing my steps. Way more efficient!"

How to Use

  1. Select an example from the bottom row to explore different u-substitutions
  2. Walk through stages 1--5 using the stage buttons to see the transformation unfold step by step
  3. Adjust the bounds a and b using the sliders on the left to see how the transformation changes
  4. Click Animate to watch dots travel along the transformation arrows from x-domain to u-domain
  5. Check Stage 5 to verify that both shaded areas give the same numerical value

Visual Elements

  • Left graph (purple): The original integrand \(f(g(x)) \cdot g'(x)\) in the x-domain with shaded area between bounds \([a, b]\)
  • Right graph (green): The transformed integrand \(f(u)\) in the u-domain with shaded area between bounds \([g(a), g(b)]\)
  • Blue curved arrows: Show the mapping \(u = g(x)\) that transforms one domain to the other
  • Red dashed lines: Bound markers on both graphs
  • Info panel: Displays stage-specific explanations, bound calculations, and area values

The Five Stages

Stage What It Shows
1 Original integral in x with shaded area between \([a, b]\)
2 The substitution \(u = g(x)\) and how it transforms the integrand
3 Bound transformation: \(x = a \to u = g(a)\) and \(x = b \to u = g(b)\)
4 New integral in u with transformed bounds and shaded area
5 Numerical confirmation that both areas are equal

Embedding This MicroSim

You can include this MicroSim on your website using the following iframe:

1
2
3
4
5
<iframe src="https://dmccreary.github.io/calculus/sims/changing-bounds/main.html"
        height="610px"
        width="100%"
        scrolling="no">
</iframe>

Lesson Plan

Learning Objectives

By the end of this activity, students will be able to:

  1. Apply u-substitution to definite integrals by changing the limits of integration
  2. Transform integration bounds from the x-domain to the u-domain using the substitution function
  3. Calculate the new bounds \(g(a)\) and \(g(b)\) and verify that the integral value is preserved

Bloom's Taxonomy Level

Apply (Level 3) -- Students apply the technique of changing bounds during u-substitution, transforming definite integrals from x-domain to u-domain.

Prerequisites

  • Understanding of u-substitution for indefinite integrals
  • Knowledge of definite integrals and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
  • Familiarity with function composition and the chain rule

Suggested Activities

Activity 1: Stage Walk-Through (10 minutes)

Have students select the first example (\(2x\cos(x^2)\)) and click through all five stages. At each stage, ask them to write down what changed and why. This builds conceptual understanding of the full transformation process.

Activity 2: Bound Exploration (10 minutes)

Using Stage 5 (Show All), have students adjust the sliders for \(a\) and \(b\) and observe how both shaded areas change simultaneously while remaining equal. Ask: "Can you find bounds where the integral is zero? What does that mean geometrically?"

Activity 3: Prediction Challenge (15 minutes)

For each example, have students calculate \(g(a)\) and \(g(b)\) by hand before revealing Stage 3. Then check their work against the visualization. This reinforces the mechanical skill of bound transformation.

Activity 4: Cross-Example Comparison (10 minutes)

Ask students to compare the four examples and discuss: "In which example do the bounds change the most dramatically? Why?" This promotes deeper analysis of how different substitution functions affect the transformation.

Assessment Questions

  1. For \(\int_0^2 2x \cos(x^2)\, dx\) with \(u = x^2\), what are the new bounds? Verify using Stage 3.
  2. If you change the lower bound \(a\) but keep \(b\) fixed, what happens to \(g(a)\) and the u-domain area? Why do both areas still match?
  3. Explain geometrically why the two shaded regions have the same area even though they look different.
  4. For \(u = \sin(x)\), what happens to the bounds when \(a = 0\) and \(b = \pi\)? What is unusual about this case?

Common Misconceptions

  • Misconception: You must always back-substitute to x after finding the antiderivative

  • Clarification: Changing bounds lets you evaluate entirely in the u-domain, which is often simpler. The MicroSim shows both approaches give the same answer.

  • Misconception: The new bounds are always in the same order (lower < upper)

  • Clarification: If \(g(x)\) is decreasing on \([a, b]\), then \(g(a) > g(b)\) and the bounds "flip." The integral still works correctly because of how signed area is defined.

  • Misconception: The two shaded regions should look identical

  • Clarification: The regions look different because the coordinate systems are different. What matters is that the numerical areas are equal -- the substitution maps one region to the other while preserving area.

References