Data-Driven Ethics Process Flow
Overview
This interactive diagram visualizes the systematic six-step process for data-driven ethical analysis. The framework guides students from initial harm identification through targeted intervention, emphasizing that ethical analysis is an iterative process where new insights inform earlier steps.
Interactive Diagram
Description
The Data-Driven Ethics Process Flow represents the core analytical methodology used throughout this course. Unlike traditional ethics approaches that focus on abstract principles, this process emphasizes measurable outcomes and evidence-based intervention strategies.
The process is divided into three phases:
- Research Phase (Blue): Steps 1-3 focus on understanding the problem through identification, quantification, and causal analysis
- Synthesis Phase (Green): Steps 4-5 involve mapping system dynamics and evaluating potential interventions
- Action Phase (Gold): Step 6 targets high-leverage intervention points for maximum impact
Workflow Steps
-
IDENTIFY - Catalog types of harm using multiple sources: health impacts, environmental damage, social costs, and economic effects
-
QUANTIFY - Apply measurement frameworks like DALYs (Disability-Adjusted Life Years), social cost accounting, and normalized metrics to determine harm magnitude
-
ANALYZE - Trace causal mechanisms to distinguish root causes from symptoms, understanding how harm propagates through systems
-
MAP - Visualize connections, feedback loops, and stakeholder relationships using systems thinking tools like causal loop diagrams
-
EVALUATE - Review evidence on past interventions across industries and contexts to identify success patterns and avoid repeated failures
-
TARGET - Identify high-leverage intervention points where small changes can yield large impacts, then design actionable strategies
Key Concepts
- Iterative Analysis: The feedback loop from TARGET back to IDENTIFY reflects that ethical analysis is never truly complete—new insights require revisiting earlier steps
- Evidence + Values = Action: The central principle emphasizes that effective ethical action requires both rigorous data and clear value commitments
- Phase-Based Approach: Color coding helps students understand the progression from research through synthesis to action
- Systems Perspective: The process incorporates systems thinking throughout, recognizing that harm exists within complex interconnected systems
Usage Notes
This diagram illustrates the workflow described above. Each node represents a step in the analytical process, with arrows showing the flow of analysis.
Node Types:
- Circle: Central principle (Evidence + Values = Action)
- Rectangles: Process steps with step number and guiding question
- Dashed arrow: Feedback loop for iteration
Color Coding:
- Blue: Research/analysis steps (1-3)
- Green: Synthesis steps (4-5)
- Gold: Action step (6)
Related Concepts
- Measuring Harm - Detailed frameworks for steps 1-2
- Impact Analysis - Systems mapping techniques for step 4
- Looking for Leverage - Intervention strategies for step 6