Skip to content

Learning Graph Generation - Complete Summary

Mission Accomplished ✓

Successfully applied the Learning Graph Generator skill to the FFT Benchmarking course, creating a comprehensive 200-concept learning graph with full pedagogical structure.

Deliverables

1. Quality Assessment ✓

File: docs/quality-assessment.md

  • Analyzed course depth and breadth
  • Verified sufficient content for 200 concepts
  • Estimated 195-235 concepts available
  • Rating: EXCELLENT - proceed with full generation

2. Concept List ✓

File: docs/course-concepts-v1.md

  • 200 concepts in Title Case format
  • Max 32 characters per label
  • Organized by 9 taxonomy categories:
  • MATH: Mathematical Foundations (20)
  • FFT: FFT Algorithms (25)
  • SIG: Signal Processing (25)
  • ARM: ARM Architecture (30)
  • MEM: Memory Management (25)
  • FXP: Fixed-Point Arithmetic (18)
  • BENCH: Benchmarking & Testing (30)
  • LIB: FFT Libraries (20)
  • OPT: Optimization (7)

3. Dependency Graph ✓

File: docs/concept-dependencies.csv

Format: ConceptID, ConceptLabel, Dependencies, TaxonomyID

Graph Properties: - 200 nodes (concepts) - 229 edges (dependencies) - Valid DAG - no cycles detected ✓ - 10 foundational concepts (zero dependencies) - Max chain depth: 7 levels - Avg dependencies: 1.15 per concept

4. Quality Validation ✓

File: docs/quality-metrics.md

DAG Structure: ✓ Valid - No cycles detected - Topological ordering possible - Clear prerequisite relationships

Connectivity: ✓ Good - Main component: 94% (188 concepts) - 6 small isolated clusters: 6% (12 concepts) - Acceptable for support topics (licensing, docs, version control)

Complexity: ✓ Manageable - Indegree 0: 10 concepts (foundational) - Indegree 1: 153 concepts (linear progression) - Indegree 2: 35 concepts (convergence) - Indegree 3: 2 concepts (advanced synthesis) - Max indegree: 3 (controlled complexity)

Chain Analysis: - Longest chains: 7 levels deep - Examples: Static Linking, Dynamic Linking, Library Dependencies - Advanced topics naturally appear deeper

5. Taxonomy Organization ✓

File: docs/concept-taxonomy.md

9 Categories - All balanced under 30% threshold ✓

Category Count % Status
ARM 30 15.0% ✓
BENCH 30 15.0% ✓
FFT 25 12.5% ✓
SIG 25 12.5% ✓
MEM 25 12.5% ✓
MATH 20 10.0% ✓
LIB 20 10.0% ✓
FXP 18 9.0% ✓
OPT 7 3.5% ✓

6. Distribution Analysis ✓

File: docs/taxonomy-distribution.md

  • Detailed concept listing by category
  • Statistical verification of balance
  • ✓ All categories under 30% threshold
  • ✓ Largest category: 15.0% (ARM and BENCH)

7. JSON Export ✓

File: docs/learning-graph.json

Format: Compatible with visualization tools - D3.js force-directed graphs - vis.js network diagrams - Cytoscape.js - Neo4j graph database

Structure: 

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
{
  "nodes": [200 concepts with id, label, taxonomy],
  "links": [229 directed edges],
  "metadata": {
    "title": "FFT Benchmarking Course Learning Graph",
    "nodeCount": 200,
    "linkCount": 229,
    "taxonomies": {...}
  }
}

8. Python Utilities ✓

Three analysis scripts created:

  1. analyze-graph.py
  2. Validates DAG structure
  3. Finds foundational concepts
  4. Calculates indegree distribution
  5. Identifies longest chains

  6. Detects disconnected components

  7. taxonomy-distribution.py

  8. Generates category statistics
  9. Verifies balance (< 30% threshold)

  10. Creates detailed listings

  11. convert-to-json.py

  12. Converts CSV to JSON format
  13. Adds metadata for visualization
  14. Optimized for graph libraries

9. Documentation ✓

File: docs/learning-graph-README.md

Complete guide including: - File descriptions - Usage instructions - Pedagogical recommendations - 10-week course structure - Visualization ideas - Next steps

Key Quality Metrics

✓ 200 concepts generated ✓ Valid DAG (no cycles) ✓ 9 balanced categories (all < 30%) ✓ 10 foundational concepts (entry points) ✓ 229 dependencies (avg 1.15 per concept) ✓ 7 levels max depth (manageable progression) ✓ 94% connectivity (strong main component) ✓ Low graph density (0.58%) - focused concepts

Pedagogical Structure

Learning Paths

Path 1: Mathematics → Algorithms → Applications MATH (20) → FFT (25) → SIG (25) → BENCH (30)

Path 2: Hardware → Software → Performance ARM (30) → MEM (25) → FXP (18) → BENCH (30)

Path 3: Practical → Theoretical LIB (20) → SIG (25) → FFT (25) → MATH (20)

10-Week Course Outline

Week Focus Categories Concepts
1-2 Foundations MATH 20
3-4 Algorithms & Signals FFT + SIG 50
5-6 Hardware Platform ARM + MEM 55
7 Precision & Testing FXP + BENCH 48
8 Tools & Optimization LIB + OPT 27
9-10 Capstone Project Integration All

Bloom's Taxonomy Coverage

The 200 concepts support learning outcomes at all 6 levels:

  1. Remember - Foundational concepts (MATH, ARM basics)
  2. Understand - Transform properties, DSP principles
  3. Apply - FFT implementations, benchmarking
  4. Analyze - Performance comparisons, optimization
  5. Evaluate - Library selection, tradeoff assessment
  6. Create - Custom benchmarks, capstone project

Use Cases

1. Course Planning

  • Use dependency chains to sequence lessons
  • Start with foundational concepts
  • Build assessments per taxonomy category

2. Student Progress Tracking

  • Map completed concepts
  • Identify prerequisite gaps
  • Visualize learning path

3. Interactive Learning

  • Visualize concept relationships
  • Explore prerequisites dynamically
  • Discover alternative paths

4. Curriculum Assessment

  • Verify coverage completeness
  • Identify concept gaps
  • Balance workload across weeks

Visualization Recommendations

  1. Interactive Network Graph
  2. Color by taxonomy
  3. Show dependencies on hover
  4. Filter by category

  5. Highlight learning paths

  6. Dependency Matrix Heatmap

  7. Row/column = concepts
  8. Cell = dependency exists

  9. Identify clusters

  10. Hierarchical Tree

  11. Root = foundational concepts
  12. Branches = dependency chains

  13. Leaves = advanced concepts

  14. Timeline View

  15. X-axis = dependency level (0-7)
  16. Y-axis = concepts
  17. Color = taxonomy

Files Generated Summary

File Purpose Lines Status
quality-assessment.md Course depth analysis ~100 ✓
course-concepts-v1.md 200 concept labels ~230 ✓
concept-dependencies.csv Dependency graph 201 ✓
quality-metrics.md Graph validation ~150 ✓
concept-taxonomy.md Category organization ~200 ✓
taxonomy-distribution.md Distribution stats ~260 ✓
learning-graph.json Visualization format ~1300 ✓
learning-graph-README.md User guide ~200 ✓
analyze-graph.py Validation script ~150 ✓
taxonomy-distribution.py Stats script ~70 ✓
convert-to-json.py JSON converter ~80 ✓

Total: 11 files generated

Success Criteria - All Met ✓

  • [x] 200 pedagogically-sound concepts
  • [x] Valid DAG structure (no cycles)
  • [x] ~12 taxonomy categories (achieved: 9)
  • [x] All categories < 30% (largest: 15%)
  • [x] Clear 3-5 letter abbreviations
  • [x] CSV format with dependencies
  • [x] Quality validation report
  • [x] Taxonomy documentation
  • [x] Distribution analysis
  • [x] JSON export for visualization
  • [x] Python utility scripts
  • [x] Complete documentation

Next Steps

  1. Create Visualization
  2. Build interactive D3.js graph viewer
  3. Add to MkDocs site

  4. Enable concept exploration

  5. Develop Content

  6. Write detailed pages for each concept
  7. Add code examples

  8. Include practice problems

  9. Design Assessments

  10. Quiz per taxonomy category
  11. Cumulative midterm and final

  12. Hands-on benchmarking labs

  13. Build Capstone

  14. Comprehensive FFT benchmark suite
  15. Multiple hardware platforms
  16. Performance analysis report

Conclusion

The Learning Graph Generator skill has been successfully applied to the FFT Benchmarking course, producing a complete 200-concept learning graph with:

  • ✓ Rigorous pedagogical structure
  • ✓ Clear prerequisite relationships
  • ✓ Balanced category distribution
  • ✓ Multiple learning paths
  • ✓ Ready for visualization
  • ✓ Fully documented

The course now has a solid foundation for content development, assessment design, and student guidance.

Generated: 2025-10-30 Method: Learning Graph Generator Skill Quality Rating: EXCELLENT