Validating Learning Graphs and Estimating Quality
If get access to learning graph for a specific topic, you might what to ask, "What is the overall quality of this learning graph?".
Here are a few points to consider:
- How many concept nodes are there in the graph?
- Are the nodes all connected to the main graph? How many nodes are there without any edges? ("orphaned" nodes)
- How many foundation nodes (no outgoing edges) are there and how many goal nodes (no incoming edges) are there?
- Is there metadata associated with the learning graph (title, creator, publication date, 3rd party validation) (see Dublin Core)
- Is there a taxonomy or ontology associated with the concepts?
- Is there a legend that is displayed with the learning graph?
- Are there 3rd party certificates or reviews associated with the learning graph?
Validating with a JSON Schema
Because JSON is a standard way of storing data that is loaded into a browser, it is convenient to use the JSON Schema