Transportation Dynamics - Identification Flywheel and Accuracy-Erosion Trap
flowchart LR
VP[Vividness\nof Panels]:::r1 -->|+| NT[Narrative\nTransportation]:::r1
IF[Identification\nwith Figure]:::r1 -->|+| NT
NT -->|+| RC[Reduced\nCounterarguing]:::shared
RC -->|+| RET[Retention of\nEmbedded Concept]:::r1
RC -->|+| RLA[Risk of Laundered\nInaccuracy]:::b1
RET -->|"+ delay ⧖"| REG[Re-engagement\nwith Chapter]:::r1
REG -->|+| IF
HAR[Historical Accuracy\nCheck Rigor]:::b1 -->|+| FEC[Fidelity of\nEmbedded Claims]:::b1
FEC -->|"−"| RLA
HAR -->|"slight −"| NT
classDef r1 fill:#4A90D9,stroke:#2C5F8A,color:#fff
classDef b1 fill:#E87D2A,stroke:#B55D15,color:#fff
classDef shared fill:#9E9E9E,stroke:#616161,color:#fff
R1 - Identification flywheel: Vivid panels and identification drive narrative transportation, which reduces counterarguing and improves retention. Re-engagement deepens identification, spinning the loop.
B1 - Accuracy-erosion trap: Transportation also reduces counterarguing against false claims, laundering inaccuracy. Historical accuracy check rigor is the brake that keeps fidelity high and risk low.
Back to Documentation