Development Workflow for Educational MicroSims
Introduction
The development of Educational MicroSims follows a systematic workflow that leverages existing resources, generative AI, prompt engineering, pre-defined rules and structured metadata to allow non-programmers to create personalized learning experiences. This document outlines the complete development process from initial discovery through integration into intelligent learning systems.
1. Repository Discovery and Initial SearchThe development workflow begins with discovering existing repositories of educational simulations. As evidenced by the search results, several established repositories exist:
PhET Interactive Simulations from the University of Colorado Boulder provides free interactive math and science simulations based on extensive educational research, while the GitHub dmccreary/microsims repository contains micro simulations specifically created by generative AI tools such as ChatGPT. Gizmos by ExploreLearning offers over 550 virtual, interactive STEM simulations designed to meet educational standards for grades 3-12.
These repositories serve as starting points for educators looking to find existing resources or templates for creating new MicroSims.
2. Faceted Search for Subject and Grade Level Refinement
Modern educational repositories implement sophisticated search capabilities that allow educators to narrow down resources using multiple criteria simultaneously. A typical faceted search interface would include:
Subject Area Filters: - Mathematics (Algebra, Geometry, Calculus, Statistics) - Science (Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Earth Science) - Computer Science - Engineering - Economics and Finance
Grade Level Filters: - Elementary (K-5) - Middle School (6-8) - High School (9-12) - Undergraduate - Graduate - Adult Education
Learning Objective Filters: - Bloom's Taxonomy levels (Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create) - Curriculum standards alignment (CCSS, NGSS, ISTE) - Duration (5-15 minutes, 15-30 minutes, 30+ minutes)
Example Search Scenario: An 8th-grade science teacher searching for physics simulations would filter by: - Subject Area: Physics - Grade Level: Middle School (6-8) - Topic: Motion and Forces - Bloom's Level: Apply - Duration: 15-30 minutes
This filtered search would return a curated list of relevant MicroSims, such as projectile motion simulations or force and acceleration demonstrations.
3. Template-Based MicroSim Generation
Once an educator identifies a similar MicroSim that closely matches their needs, they can use it as a template for generating a customized version using generative AI tools. The template serves as both inspiration and technical foundation for the new simulation.
Template Selection Process: 1. Identify Core Functionality: Determine what aspects of the existing MicroSim align with learning objectives 2. Analyze Technical Components: Review the control interfaces, visual elements, and interaction patterns 3. Extract Educational Elements: Identify the underlying mathematical models, concepts demonstrated, and assessment opportunities
Template Benefits: - Provides proven interaction patterns - Establishes responsive design frameworks - Demonstrates effective control placement - Includes accessibility considerations
4. Sample Customization Prompt for Generative AI
Here's a comprehensive prompt for customizing a MicroSim based on an existing template:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 |
|
5. Iterative Development with Preview and Refinement
The development process involves multiple iterations of generation, preview, and refinement. Modern AI-assisted development tools provide real-time preview capabilities that allow educators to see immediate results and request modifications.
Preview and Testing Cycle: 1. Initial Generation: AI creates the first version based on the prompt 2. Preview Testing: Educator tests functionality in a sandbox environment 3. Feedback Collection: Identify areas needing modification or enhancement 4. Refinement Prompt: Request specific changes or additions
Sample Refinement Prompt for Adding/Removing Controls:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 |
|
6. Metadata Generation for Cataloging
Once the MicroSim is finalized, the next step involves generating comprehensive metadata that describes the simulation for repository cataloging. This metadata follows the established schema for Educational MicroSims.
Sample Metadata Generation Prompt:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 |
|
This metadata enables sophisticated search and discovery capabilities while supporting integration with learning management systems and adaptive learning platforms.
7. Testing, Feedback, and LMS Integration
The final phase involves systematic testing, educational feedback collection, and integration into intelligent learning systems.
Testing Phase
Technical Testing: - Cross-browser compatibility verification - Responsive design testing across devices - Accessibility compliance (WCAG guidelines) - Performance optimization - Integration testing with LMS platforms
Educational Testing: - Pilot testing with target student populations - Educator usability assessment - Learning objective alignment verification - Assessment question validation
Feedback Collection
Student Feedback: - Engagement metrics (time on task, interaction frequency) - Comprehension assessments (pre/post testing) - Usability feedback (ease of use, clarity of instructions) - Preference data (control layout, visual design)
Educator Feedback: - Pedagogical effectiveness assessment - Integration ease evaluation - Curriculum alignment feedback - Technical support requirements
Intelligent Textbook Integration
Learning Path Integration: The MicroSim becomes part of an adaptive learning sequence within an intelligent textbook system that:
- Prerequisites Assessment: Verifies student readiness based on prior concept mastery
- Personalized Sequencing: Places the MicroSim at optimal points in individual learning paths
- Adaptive Difficulty: Adjusts parameters based on student performance data
- Remediation Triggering: Identifies students needing additional support
xAPI Integration for Learning Analytics:
The system logs detailed interaction events following xAPI specifications:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 |
|
Learning Analytics Applications: - Performance Tracking: Monitor student progress across multiple MicroSims - Concept Mastery Assessment: Identify areas where students struggle - Adaptive Recommendations: Suggest additional resources or alternative approaches - Curriculum Optimization: Analyze effectiveness of different MicroSim sequences
Recommendation Engine Integration
The intelligent textbook system uses collected xAPI data to make evidence-based recommendations:
- Similar Student Matching: Identify students with comparable learning patterns
- Success Prediction: Estimate likelihood of success with specific MicroSims
- Optimal Timing: Determine best moments to introduce new simulations
- Personalized Parameters: Adjust default settings based on individual preferences
Conclusion
The development workflow for Educational MicroSims represents a sophisticated pipeline that transforms educational needs into personalized, interactive learning experiences. By leveraging existing repositories, faceted search capabilities, AI-assisted generation, iterative refinement, comprehensive metadata, and intelligent integration systems, educators can create and deploy highly targeted simulations that adapt to individual student needs.
This workflow addresses the scalability challenges in educational technology while maintaining pedagogical rigor and technical quality. As the system matures, the accumulated data from thousands of student interactions will continuously improve both the individual MicroSims and the broader intelligent learning ecosystem, creating a self-improving educational technology platform that becomes more effective over time.