Learning Modality Effectiveness
This chart visualizes the dramatic difference in knowledge retention across different learning modalities, from passive reading to active interactive simulations with prediction.
Overview
Educational research consistently shows that active learning methods significantly outperform passive approaches. This visualization presents retention data across six learning modalities:
- Passive methods (gray): Reading text and watching videos show the lowest retention rates
- Semi-active methods (light blue): Static diagrams and animations improve engagement
- Active methods (blue/gold): Interactive simulations dramatically increase retention, especially when students predict outcomes before manipulating variables
The "active learning threshold" at 50% marks the boundary where students transition from passive consumption to active engagement with material.
Features
Interactive Elements
- Hover tooltips showing exact retention percentages
- Animated bar growth on page load
- Annotations highlighting key insights
Visual Design
- Color-coded by learning modality type
- MicroSim approaches highlighted with bracket annotation
- Clear axis labels and professional typography
Customization Guide
Changing the Data
Edit the data array in main.html:
1 | |
Adjusting Colors
Modify the backgroundColors array:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | |
Modifying Annotations
Adjust the threshold line position:
1 2 3 4 5 6 | |
Technical Details
- Library: Chart.js 4.4.0 with Annotation plugin
- Chart Type: Horizontal bar chart (
indexAxis: 'y') - Browser Compatibility: All modern browsers
- Responsive: Yes, adapts to container width
References
- Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods
- Freeman, S., et al. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in STEM
- Chi, M. T., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework
- Chart.js Documentation