Skip to content

Course Description Quality Assessment

Assessment Date: 2025-11-20 Learning Graph Generator Version: 0.02

Overall Quality Score: 23/100

Scoring Breakdown

Element Points Available Points Earned Status
Title 5 5 ✓ Complete
Target Audience 5 5 ✓ Complete
Prerequisites 5 0 ✗ Missing
Main Topics Covered 10 10 ✓ Complete
Topics Excluded 5 0 ✗ Missing
Learning Outcomes Header 5 0 ✗ Missing
Remember Level (Bloom's) 10 0 ✗ Missing
Understand Level (Bloom's) 10 0 ✗ Missing
Apply Level (Bloom's) 10 0 ✗ Missing
Analyze Level (Bloom's) 10 0 ✗ Missing
Evaluate Level (Bloom's) 10 0 ✗ Missing
Create Level (Bloom's) 10 0 ✗ Missing
Descriptive Context 5 3 ⚠ Partial
TOTAL 100 23 Needs Significant Improvement

Elements Found

✓ Strong Areas

  1. Clear Title (5/5 points)
  2. "Personal Finance: A practical introduction to all areas of finance for modern life"

  3. Descriptive and appropriate for the target audience

  4. Target Audience (5/5 points)

  5. Clearly identified: "young adults (high school or college freshman)"

  6. Appropriate scope definition

  7. Main Topics Covered (10/10 points)

  8. Excellent topic coverage with 12 comprehensive chapters
  9. Topics include:
    • Foundational Financial Concepts
    • Banking & Cash Management
    • Budgeting & Financial Planning
    • Credit & Debt Management
    • Saving & Investing
    • Income & Taxes
    • Insurance & Risk Management
    • Major Purchases & Loans
    • Consumer Protection & Financial Security
    • College & Education Planning
    • Career Planning & Income
    • Retirement & Long-term Planning

  10. Each topic includes detailed subtopics

  11. Descriptive Context (3/5 points)

  12. Brief context provided: "intended to cover all things financial for modern life"
  13. Could be expanded to explain why financial literacy is important for this age group

Critical Gaps

✗ Missing Prerequisites (0/5 points)

The course description does not specify prerequisites. It should explicitly state either: - "Prerequisites: None" (if this is a foundational course) - Or list specific knowledge/skills needed (e.g., "basic arithmetic and algebra")

✗ Missing Topics Excluded (0/5 points)

No boundaries are set for what the course does NOT cover. Consider adding a section like: - "Topics NOT covered: Advanced investment strategies, business finance, corporate accounting, derivatives trading, international finance"

✗ Missing Learning Outcomes (0/65 points)

This is the most critical gap. The course description completely lacks learning outcomes based on Bloom's Taxonomy (2001 revision), which accounts for 65% of the quality score.

A complete course description should include a section titled "After this course, students will be able to:" followed by specific, measurable outcomes at each cognitive level:

Remember (recall facts and basic concepts): - Define key financial terms such as APR, compound interest, and diversification - List the main types of financial institutions and their services - Identify the components of a credit score - State the basic principles of budgeting

Understand (explain ideas or concepts): - Explain how compound interest affects long-term savings - Describe the relationship between risk and return in investing - Summarize the key features of different types of insurance - Interpret information on a paycheck stub and W-2 form

Apply (use information in new situations): - Create a personal budget based on income and expenses - Calculate the true cost of credit card debt with interest - Complete a basic tax return (1040-EZ) - Compare different checking account options to select the best fit

Analyze (draw connections among ideas): - Analyze personal spending patterns to identify areas for improvement - Compare the long-term costs and benefits of renting vs. buying a home - Evaluate the total cost of college including loans and opportunity cost - Examine how different debt repayment strategies affect total interest paid

Evaluate (justify decisions or courses of action): - Assess the appropriateness of different investment options based on goals and risk tolerance - Judge the quality and legitimacy of financial advice and products - Critique common financial scams and predatory lending practices - Evaluate insurance policy options to determine adequate coverage

Create (produce new or original work): - Design a comprehensive financial plan for the next 5 years - Develop an investment strategy aligned with retirement goals - Create a debt elimination plan with specific milestones - Formulate a strategy for building and maintaining excellent credit

Estimated Concept Generation Capacity

Based on the current course description: - Estimated concepts: 180-220 concepts - Target concepts: 200 concepts - Assessment: ✓ Adequate topic breadth for 200 concepts

The 12 chapters with detailed subtopics provide sufficient granularity to derive 200 distinct concepts. The challenge is not quantity, but ensuring the concepts align with measurable learning outcomes.

Comparison with Similar Courses

A typical high school or college-level personal finance course at this scope would include: - ✓ 10-15 chapters (you have 12) ✓ - ✓ Coverage of banking, budgeting, credit, investing, taxes, insurance, major purchases - ✓ Practical, applied focus appropriate for young adults - ✗ Explicit learning outcomes tied to Bloom's Taxonomy ✗ - ✗ Clear prerequisites and boundaries ✗

Your course content is comprehensive and well-structured. The primary deficiency is the lack of explicit learning outcomes.

Recommendations for Improvement

Priority 1: Add Learning Outcomes (Critical - adds 65 points)

Add a section titled "Learning Outcomes" with the header "After this course, students will be able to:" followed by 3-5 specific, measurable outcomes at each of the six Bloom's Taxonomy levels (18-30 outcomes total).

Priority 2: Specify Prerequisites (adds 5 points)

Add a clear prerequisites section. For this audience, it's likely: 

1
2
**Prerequisites:** None. This course assumes no prior knowledge of personal finance.
Basic arithmetic and algebraic skills are helpful but not required.

Priority 3: Define Boundaries (adds 5 points)

Add a "Topics Not Covered" section: 

1
2
3
4
**Topics Not Covered:** This course focuses on personal finance for individuals.
It does not cover: business finance, corporate accounting, advanced investment
strategies (options, futures, forex trading), tax preparation for businesses,
or commercial real estate.

Priority 4: Enhance Context (adds 2 points)

Expand the introduction to explain: - Why financial literacy is critical for young adults - The long-term benefits of financial education - How this course prepares students for financial independence

Bloom's Taxonomy Integration Guidance

The 2001 revised Bloom's Taxonomy has six cognitive levels:

  1. Remember - Retrieving relevant knowledge from memory
  2. Understand - Constructing meaning from messages
  3. Apply - Carrying out or using a procedure
  4. Analyze - Breaking material into parts and detecting relationships
  5. Evaluate - Making judgments based on criteria and standards
  6. Create - Putting elements together to form a coherent whole

For a practical personal finance course, emphasize Apply, Analyze, and Evaluate levels, with Create-level outcomes focusing on capstone projects (comprehensive financial plans, investment strategies, etc.).

Should You Proceed?

Recommendation: DO NOT PROCEED with learning graph generation yet.

With a quality score of 23/100, the course description lacks the structure needed to generate high-quality, pedagogically sound learning concepts. Specifically: - Without learning outcomes, it's difficult to ensure concepts align with measurable skills - The concepts may focus too heavily on "Remember" level knowledge rather than higher-order thinking - The learning graph's dependency structure should reflect cognitive progression through Bloom's levels

Next Steps

  1. Add the Learning Outcomes section with outcomes at all six Bloom's levels
  2. Specify prerequisites explicitly
  3. Define course boundaries (what's NOT covered)
  4. Enhance the descriptive context about course value
  5. Re-run this assessment to verify a quality score above 70
  6. Then proceed with learning graph generation

Once you improve the course description, the learning graph will be: - More pedagogically sound - Better aligned with measurable learning objectives - More useful for creating assessments and learning pathways - More valuable for students and instructors

Assessment Complete Quality Score: 23/100 Status: Needs significant improvement before proceeding