Leverage Point Explorer

This MicroSim visualizes Donella Meadows' 12 leverage points for intervening in a system, applied to the quantum computing hype cycle. Leverage points are ranked from weakest (bottom) to strongest (top), with each one mapped to a concrete quantum computing example.

The key insight is that most interventions in the quantum computing debate target the weakest leverage points — adjusting parameters like qubit count or increasing budgets. The most powerful interventions operate at the level of paradigms and system goals, questioning whether quantum computing is even the right approach for the problems being targeted.

Leverage Point Explorer MicroSim

View Leverage Point Explorer MicroSim Fullscreen

Click any leverage point to expand its description and see how it applies to the quantum computing investment system. Notice the color gradient from red (weak, easy interventions) to green (strong, transformative interventions). The bar length shows relative effectiveness — parameter tweaks at the bottom barely register, while paradigm shifts at the top reshape the entire system.

Key Takeaways

• Most QC industry activity targets leverage points #10-12 — adding qubits, increasing budgets, building new labs. These are the weakest interventions.
• Information flows (#6) and system rules (#5) offer moderate leverage. Requiring classical baselines and publishing negative results would meaningfully shift the field.
• Redefining success metrics (#3) from "qubits shipped" to "economic value delivered" would force the entire industry to justify its trajectory.
• The strongest lever (#1) is stepping outside the quantum computing paradigm entirely and asking whether the approach is fundamentally sound.
• Meadows observed that people instinctively intervene at the weakest leverage points because they are easiest — exactly the pattern we see in quantum computing investment.