Skip to content

Blinding Types Flowchart

Run the Blinding Flowchart Fullscreen

Edit in the p5.js Editor

About This MicroSim

"Here's a tricky concept," Sylvia says, adjusting her glasses thoughtfully. "Even well-intentioned researchers and participants can unconsciously influence results. Blinding is how we keep everyone honest - including ourselves!"

This interactive flowchart compares three levels of blinding in experiments: no blinding, single-blind, and double-blind. See who knows what in each scenario and understand the trade-offs.

What You'll Learn

  • The difference between no blinding, single-blind, and double-blind designs
  • Who has knowledge of treatment assignment in each scenario
  • How blinding reduces different types of bias
  • When each type of blinding is appropriate

How to Use

  1. Click any blinding type to select it
  2. Hover over a type to see advantages and disadvantages
  3. Click "Show Example" to see a real-world scenario for the selected type
  4. Compare the figures to see who knows vs. who is blinded

Understanding the Display

Visual Element Meaning
Open eyes Person knows treatment assignment
Blindfold Person does not know treatment assignment
Solid arrow Information flows to this person
Dashed arrow Information is blocked
Colored bar Bias risk level (green=low, orange=medium, red=high)

Key Concepts

No Blinding

When neither subjects nor researchers are blinded: - Everyone knows who gets which treatment - Subject expectations can affect outcomes (placebo effect) - Researchers may unconsciously treat groups differently - Results are most susceptible to bias

When to use: When blinding is impossible (e.g., exercise vs. sedentary study)

Single-Blind

When subjects do not know their treatment but researchers do: - Prevents subject expectation effects - Controls for placebo effect - Researchers may still influence results unconsciously - Simpler to implement than double-blind

When to use: Drug trials with placebo pills, taste tests

Double-Blind

When neither subjects nor researchers know the treatment assignment: - Prevents both subject and researcher bias - Gold standard for clinical trials - Requires a third party to manage treatment codes - Most rigorous but also most complex

When to use: Clinical drug trials, any study where researcher behavior could influence outcomes

"Acorn for your thoughts?" Sylvia muses. "The researcher measuring your improvement might smile more if they think you got the 'good' treatment. That tiny difference could affect your performance!"

Embedding This MicroSim

1
<iframe src="https://dmccreary.github.io/statistics-course/sims/blinding-flowchart/main.html" height="402px" width="100%" scrolling="no"></iframe>

Lesson Plan

Learning Objectives

By the end of this activity, students will be able to:

  1. Define single-blind and double-blind experiments
  2. Explain who is blinded in each type of design
  3. Identify which type of blinding is appropriate for different studies
  4. Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each approach

Target Audience

  • AP Statistics students (high school)
  • Research methods courses
  • Clinical research training

Prerequisites

  • Understanding of experimental design basics
  • Knowledge of placebo effect
  • Concept of researcher bias

Classroom Activities

Activity 1: Matching Game (10 minutes)

Have students match scenarios to the appropriate blinding type:

  1. "Patients receive identical-looking pills from nurses who don't know which is which"
  2. "Athletes try a new training technique; coaches know who is using it"
  3. "Participants taste-test cookies; the researcher knows which recipe is which"

Activity 2: Why Blind? (15 minutes)

For each scenario, discuss what could go wrong without blinding:

  1. A doctor studying a new pain medication
  2. A teacher testing a new teaching method
  3. A researcher studying whether meditation reduces stress

Activity 3: Design the Blinding (10 minutes)

For these research questions, have students design appropriate blinding:

  1. Does a new sunscreen prevent sunburn? (What would the placebo be?)
  2. Does tutoring improve test scores? (Can this be blinded? Why/why not?)
  3. Does a new fertilizer increase tomato yield? (Who needs to be blinded?)

Common Mistakes to Address

  1. Assuming blinding is always possible: Some treatments cannot be hidden
  2. Forgetting data analysts: In truly double-blind studies, analysts may also be blinded
  3. Ignoring partial blinding: Sometimes only outcome assessors can be blinded
  4. Confusing terms: "Double-blind" means neither subjects NOR researchers, not "twice as blind"

Assessment Questions

  1. In a single-blind study of a new anxiety medication, who knows which treatment each patient receives?

  2. A researcher is testing whether yoga reduces blood pressure. Can this study be double-blind? Explain.

  3. Why is double-blind considered the "gold standard" for clinical trials?

  4. A drug company's researchers are very excited about their new medication. How might this affect results in an unblinded study?

References