Skip to content

Fixes that Fail: Banning AI Tools to Preserve "Authentic Learning"

Here's an educational technology example of the "Fixes that Fail" archetype:

The Problem

A school district faces concerns about students using ChatGPT and other AI tools to complete assignments, leading to fears about academic dishonesty, reduced critical thinking, and students not learning to write or research independently.

The Quick Fix

The district implements a complete ban on AI tools - blocking access on school networks, prohibiting AI use in assignments, and implementing strict plagiarism detection software to catch AI-generated work, focusing on "preserving authentic student learning."

Initial Success

  • Traditional assignment submissions increase as students can't rely on AI assistance
  • Teachers feel more control over ensuring work is genuinely student-produced
  • Academic integrity concerns appear resolved with clear anti-AI policies
  • Parents support the policy believing it protects "real learning"
  • Standardized writing samples improve in controlled testing environments
  • Administrative oversight becomes simpler with clear black-and-white rules

The Unintended Consequences

Within 1-2 years, significant learning gaps emerge:

  • Students become digitally illiterate in the most important emerging technology of their time
  • Critical AI literacy skills never develop - students can't evaluate AI outputs or understand limitations
  • Research and writing skills stagnate without learning to effectively prompt and collaborate with AI
  • Competitive disadvantage grows compared to students in AI-integrated learning environments
  • Workplace preparation suffers as most careers will require AI collaboration skills
  • Innovation thinking declines without exposure to AI as a creative thinking partner

The Larger Problem Emerges

The AI avoidance creates profound educational obsolescence:

  • Students graduate unprepared for a workforce where AI collaboration is essential
  • Critical thinking actually weakens without practice evaluating and refining AI outputs
  • Information literacy deteriorates as students miss learning to fact-check and verify AI-generated content
  • Creative problem-solving suffers without understanding AI as a tool for ideation and iteration
  • Digital citizenship gaps widen as students don't learn responsible AI use and ethics
  • Economic opportunities diminish as other districts prepare AI-literate graduates

The Vicious Cycle

Facing evidence of student unpreparedness for modern work and college environments, the district responds with:

  • Stricter enforcement of AI detection and punishment policies
  • More intensive traditional skill drilling to compensate for perceived deficits
  • Eliminating technology integration in other subjects to avoid AI contamination
  • Hiring teachers specifically for their opposition to educational technology
  • Creating "AI-free zones" as selling points to parents fearful of technology
  • Blaming external pressure rather than examining policy effectiveness

The System Structure

AI Cheating Concerns → Complete AI Ban → Traditional Work Increase → Digital Illiteracy & Unpreparedness → Worse Real-World Readiness → Stricter AI Prohibition

The Root Cause Solution

Genuinely preparing students for an AI-integrated world might involve:

  • Teaching responsible AI use as a collaboration tool rather than a replacement for thinking
  • Developing critical evaluation skills for AI-generated content and outputs
  • Creating assignments that require AI literacy - prompting, refining, and fact-checking
  • Building understanding of AI capabilities, limitations, and ethical considerations
  • Integrating AI as a learning assistant while maintaining human creativity and critical thinking
  • Preparing students for careers where AI collaboration will be essential
  • Teaching the difference between AI assistance and AI dependence

This example demonstrates how attempting to preserve traditional educational approaches by banning emerging technologies can leave students profoundly unprepared for the world they'll enter, while failing to develop the critical thinking skills needed to use these powerful tools responsibly and effectively.