Skip to content

Fixes that Fail: Zero Tolerance Discipline Policies in Schools

Here's an educational discipline example of the "Fixes that Fail" archetype:

The Problem

A school district faces increasing concerns about student misbehavior, violence, drug use, and disruptions that interfere with learning and create an unsafe environment.

The Quick Fix

The district implements zero tolerance policies - automatic suspensions or expulsions for any violation, regardless of context, intent, or severity. Fighting, drug possession, weapons (including toy guns or butter knives), and even minor infractions receive identical harsh punishments.

Initial Success

  • Immediate visible action reassures parents and community about school safety
  • Administrative decisions become simpler with no discretion required
  • Legal liability appears reduced through consistent, documented responses
  • Political support increases as leaders appear "tough on discipline"
  • Some serious incidents decrease due to fear of consequences
  • Media coverage is positive about the district's "firm stance"

The Unintended Consequences

Over the school year, deeper problems emerge:

  • Minor infractions receive disproportionate punishment (kindergartner suspended for finger guns)
  • Racial and socioeconomic disparities increase as subjective infractions are reported differently
  • Students lose trust in authority seeing unfair or excessive punishments
  • Learning time is lost as suspended students fall behind academically
  • Recidivism increases as suspended students often get into more trouble while unsupervised
  • School-to-prison pipeline accelerates for vulnerable students

The Larger Problem Emerges

The rigid discipline system creates worse behavioral outcomes:

  • Dropout rates increase among suspended students who disengage from school
  • More serious behavioral problems develop as students learn the system is punitive, not supportive
  • Classroom disruptions continue because underlying causes aren't addressed
  • Teacher burnout increases from dealing with policy rigidity and student resentment
  • Special needs students suffer disproportionately as their behavioral challenges aren't accommodated
  • Community trust erodes as families experience arbitrary punishment of their children

The Vicious Cycle

Facing continued behavioral problems, administrators often respond with:

  • Even stricter zero tolerance rules covering more minor infractions
  • Increased security measures like metal detectors and police presence
  • Mandatory reporting requirements that criminalize normal childhood behavior
  • Expanding punishable offenses to include dress code or attendance issues
  • Longer suspension periods that keep problematic students out longer
  • Alternative schools that segregate "problem" students without addressing root causes

The System Structure

Behavioral Problems → Zero Tolerance Policies → Apparent Safety/Order → Student Disengagement & Worse Behavior → More Serious Problems → Stricter Zero Tolerance

The Root Cause Solution

Effective discipline might focus on:

  • Restorative justice practices that help students understand impact and make amends
  • Social-emotional learning programs that teach conflict resolution and self-regulation
  • Addressing underlying issues like trauma, learning disabilities, or family problems
  • Training teachers in positive behavior support and classroom management
  • Creating engaging curricula that reduce behavioral problems through student investment
  • Building relationships and mentorship rather than relying solely on punishment
  • Implementing graduated responses that match consequences to severity and intent

This example shows how rigid punitive responses to behavioral problems can create the very disengagement and alienation that lead to worse behavior, while disproportionately harming vulnerable students and failing to address the root causes of disciplinary issues.