Skip to content

Generative AI Center of Excellence

Prompt

Create a new document describing the process for an generative AI center of excellence (GenAI CoE). The core of this process is to create a "funnel" of generative AI ideas.

A one hour online training program is offered to help people generate grate ideas that are both practical and have a good ROI.

Everyone in the organization can submit their ideas in a web form.

The ideas are reviewed by a GenAI expert group and a review is sent to the submitters and their managers.

Ideas are categorized and scored based on factors such as feasibility, risk and benefits.

Awards are given out to individuals or teams with the best ideas.

Each month the expert group team reviews new ideas and selects a few to be funded by a development team.

The GenAI development teams report to the GenAI CoE on their progress.

Each quarter, the GenAI CoE reports to executives on the status of their idea funnel. The funnel reports are similar to a traditional "pipeline" report that shows how many ideas are in various stages.

The GenAI team has a taxonomy of the types of problems solved and a taxonomy of the ways they are solved (tools and frameworks).

The GenAI team encourages teams to work together that have similar problems and to build a shared code repository for the entire organization to use.

Return this document as a Markdown document. Suggest places where charts an figures should be placed. Make sure there are two newlines before each list.

Response

Generative AI Center of Excellence: Idea Funnel Process

Executive Summary

The Generative AI Center of Excellence (GenAI CoE) operates on a systematic funnel approach to identify, evaluate, develop, and deploy generative AI solutions across the organization. This process ensures that AI initiatives are strategically aligned, technically feasible, and deliver measurable business value while fostering organization-wide innovation and collaboration.

[Suggested Figure: High-level GenAI CoE Idea Funnel Overview - showing the flow from idea submission through deployment]

Infographic Prompt Please create a new p5.js program that contains an infographic for the High-level GenAI CoE Idea Funnel Overview - showing the flow from idea submission through deployment. The infographic has colored regions with a short label. When the user hovers over the region an infobox appears that has the details of what happens at each step. New ideas come from a "New GenAI Idea Form" on the left side of this infographic. "Summary Dashboard " reports with KPIs appears on the right side of the infographic. Generate the full HTML file, but do not indent the JavaScript code so the JavaScript code is easy to paste into the p5.js editor. Show a preview of the infographic on the right side of your canvas.

1. Foundation: AI Literacy Training Program

1.1 One-Hour Online Training Module

The GenAI CoE provides a comprehensive one-hour online training program designed to educate employees on:

  • Fundamentals of generative AI capabilities and limitations
  • Identifying high-value use cases within their domain
  • Understanding feasibility constraints and technical requirements
  • ROI calculation frameworks for AI projects
  • Best practices for idea formulation and submission

1.2 Training Objectives

The training program ensures participants can:

  • Recognize opportunities where generative AI can add value
  • Distinguish between feasible and unfeasible AI applications
  • Articulate business benefits and success metrics
  • Understand implementation complexity and resource requirements

[Suggested Chart: Training Module Completion Rates by Department]

2. Idea Submission Process

2.1 Universal Access Web Portal

All employees have access to a standardized web form for submitting GenAI ideas that captures:

  • Problem statement and current process description
  • Proposed AI solution approach
  • Expected benefits and success metrics
  • Resource requirements and timeline estimates
  • Stakeholder impact assessment
  • Risk considerations

2.2 Submission Guidelines

Clear criteria help employees submit high-quality ideas:

  • Focus on specific, measurable business problems
  • Include baseline performance metrics where possible
  • Identify key stakeholders and decision makers
  • Provide realistic implementation timelines
  • Consider data availability and quality requirements

[Suggested Figure: Idea Submission Web Form Interface Mockup]

3. Expert Review and Feedback Process

3.1 GenAI Expert Review Panel

A dedicated expert group consisting of:

  • AI/ML technical specialists
  • Business analysts with domain expertise
  • Risk management representatives
  • IT infrastructure specialists
  • Change management professionals

3.2 Review Process

Each submitted idea undergoes:

  • Technical feasibility assessment
  • Business value analysis
  • Risk evaluation
  • Resource requirement validation
  • Strategic alignment review

3.3 Feedback Delivery

Within two weeks of submission:

  • Detailed written feedback provided to submitters
  • Copy sent to submitter's direct manager
  • Recommendations for next steps or improvements
  • Connection to similar ongoing initiatives when applicable

4. Categorization and Scoring Framework

4.1 Evaluation Criteria

Ideas are scored across multiple dimensions:

Feasibility (1-5 scale)

  • Technical complexity
  • Data availability and quality
  • Integration requirements
  • Timeline realism

Risk Assessment (1-5 scale)

  • Technical risk
  • Business continuity risk
  • Regulatory compliance risk
  • Change management risk

Benefits Analysis (1-5 scale)

  • Cost savings potential
  • Revenue generation opportunity
  • Productivity improvements
  • Strategic competitive advantage

[Suggested Chart: Scoring Matrix with Feasibility vs. Benefits Quadrant Analysis]

4.2 Categorization System

Ideas are classified by:

  • Problem Type: Process automation, content generation, decision support, customer service, etc.
  • Complexity Level: Simple automation, moderate integration, complex transformation
  • Department/Function: HR, Finance, Marketing, Operations, etc.
  • Implementation Timeframe: Quick wins (0-3 months), Medium-term (3-12 months), Long-term (12+ months)

5. Recognition and Awards Program

5.1 Award Categories

  • Innovation Excellence: Most creative and impactful ideas
  • Business Impact: Highest ROI potential
  • Technical Innovation: Novel application of AI capabilities
  • Cross-Functional Collaboration: Ideas spanning multiple departments

5.2 Recognition Process

  • Monthly recognition for top-scoring submissions
  • Quarterly awards ceremony with executive participation
  • Internal newsletter features and case studies
  • Professional development opportunities for award recipients

[Suggested Figure: Awards Dashboard showing monthly and quarterly recognition metrics]

6. Monthly Funding and Selection Process

6.1 Expert Panel Review Meetings

Monthly meetings where the expert group:

  • Reviews all submitted and scored ideas
  • Considers available development resources
  • Evaluates strategic priorities and timing
  • Selects 2-5 ideas for active development funding

6.2 Selection Criteria

Priority given to ideas that:

  • Score highest on combined feasibility and benefits metrics
  • Align with current organizational strategic objectives
  • Leverage existing technical infrastructure
  • Demonstrate clear success measurement criteria
  • Have engaged stakeholder support

6.3 Resource Allocation

Selected projects receive:

  • Dedicated development team assignment
  • Budget allocation for tools and infrastructure
  • Project management support
  • Regular progress monitoring and support

[Suggested Chart: Monthly Funding Pipeline showing ideas selected, in development, and completed]

7. Development Team Reporting Structure

7.1 Progress Tracking

Development teams provide bi-weekly reports to the GenAI CoE including:

  • Milestone achievement status
  • Technical challenges and solutions
  • Resource utilization and budget status
  • Stakeholder feedback and engagement
  • Timeline adjustments and risk mitigation

7.2 Support and Escalation

The GenAI CoE provides:

  • Technical guidance and best practices
  • Resource reallocation when needed
  • Escalation paths for significant blockers
  • Cross-team collaboration facilitation

8. Quarterly Executive Reporting

8.1 Pipeline Report Structure

Quarterly executive reports include:

Funnel Metrics

  • Total ideas submitted
  • Ideas in review phase
  • Ideas approved for development
  • Projects in active development
  • Successfully deployed solutions
  • Projects discontinued and lessons learned

Performance Analytics

  • ROI achieved from deployed solutions
  • Resource utilization efficiency
  • Time-to-deployment metrics
  • User adoption and satisfaction rates

Strategic Insights

  • Emerging trends in AI application areas
  • Capability gaps and investment recommendations
  • Competitive intelligence and market opportunities
  • Risk assessment and mitigation strategies

[Suggested Figure: Executive Dashboard with Funnel Visualization and Key Performance Indicators]

8.2 Success Stories and Case Studies

Each quarterly report features:

  • Detailed case studies of successful implementations
  • Quantified business impact and lessons learned
  • Best practices and replicable frameworks
  • Recommendations for scaling successful approaches

9. Taxonomy and Knowledge Management

9.1 Problem Taxonomy

The GenAI CoE maintains a structured classification of:

Problem Categories

  • Content creation and generation
  • Process automation and optimization
  • Data analysis and insights generation
  • Customer interaction and support
  • Decision support and recommendation systems
  • Quality assurance and testing

Business Functions

  • Human Resources
  • Finance and Accounting
  • Marketing and Sales
  • Operations and Supply Chain
  • Customer Service
  • Research and Development

9.2 Solution Taxonomy

Tools and Frameworks

  • Large Language Models (LLMs) and applications
  • Image and video generation tools
  • Code generation and development assistants
  • Document processing and analysis platforms
  • Conversational AI and chatbot frameworks
  • Integration and workflow automation tools

Implementation Patterns

  • API integration approaches
  • User interface design patterns
  • Data pipeline architectures
  • Security and compliance frameworks
  • Testing and validation methodologies

[Suggested Figure: Interactive Taxonomy Visualization showing relationships between problems and solutions]

10. Collaboration and Shared Resources

10.1 Cross-Team Collaboration Framework

The GenAI CoE facilitates collaboration by:

  • Identifying teams working on similar problem domains
  • Organizing regular cross-functional working groups
  • Sharing technical approaches and lessons learned
  • Coordinating resource sharing and knowledge transfer

10.2 Shared Code Repository

Repository Structure

  • Reusable components and libraries
  • Template solutions for common use cases
  • Integration utilities and connectors
  • Testing frameworks and validation tools
  • Documentation and implementation guides

Governance and Maintenance

  • Code review and quality standards
  • Version control and release management
  • Security scanning and compliance validation
  • Community contribution guidelines and recognition

10.3 Knowledge Sharing Initiatives

  • Monthly technical lunch-and-learn sessions
  • Quarterly cross-departmental showcases
  • Annual GenAI innovation conference
  • External community engagement and thought leadership

[Suggested Figure: Collaboration Network Diagram showing connections between teams and shared resources]

Conclusion

The GenAI Center of Excellence idea funnel process creates a systematic approach to harnessing organizational creativity while ensuring strategic alignment and technical feasibility. By combining structured evaluation with collaborative development and knowledge sharing, organizations can maximize the value of their generative AI investments while building sustainable innovation capabilities.

This framework enables continuous learning, reduces implementation risks, and accelerates the adoption of proven AI solutions across the enterprise. Success depends on sustained executive commitment, adequate resource allocation, and a culture that encourages experimentation and cross-functional collaboration.

[Suggested Figure: Success Metrics Dashboard showing overall program impact and ROI]