Bronze Age Origins and the First Civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt

Summary

This chapter covers the technological and organizational breakthroughs that produced the world's first urban, literate states. It treats metallurgy origins, the urban revolution, the invention of writing systems (cuneiform and hieroglyphics), and the long arcs of Mesopotamian civilization (Sumer, the Akkadian Empire, Babylonia, the Hammurabi Code) and Egyptian civilization (Old, Middle, and New Kingdoms, pharaonic kingship, Egyptian religion, pyramid construction). It also covers the ancient-DNA-driven understanding of the Yamnaya migration and Proto-Indo-European spread out of the Pontic-Caspian steppe, steppe pastoralism, the early Liangzhu hydraulic state, and the 4.2 ka climate event that helped end the Akkadian Empire.

Concepts Covered

This chapter covers the following 23 concepts from the learning graph:

1. Bronze Age
2. Metallurgy Origins
3. Urban Revolution
4. Writing Systems
5. Cuneiform
6. Hieroglyphics
7. Mesopotamian Civilization
8. Sumer
9. Akkadian Empire
10. Babylonia
11. Hammurabi Code
12. Egyptian Civilization
13. Old Kingdom Egypt
14. Middle Kingdom Egypt
15. New Kingdom Egypt
16. Pharaoh Kingship
17. Egyptian Religion
18. Pyramid Construction
19. Yamnaya Migration
20. Proto-Indo-European
21. Steppe Pastoralism
22. 4.2 Ka Event
23. Liangzhu Culture

Prerequisites

This chapter builds on concepts from:

• Chapter 1: Foundations of Historical Thinking
• Chapter 4: Paleolithic Migrations and Ice-Age Worlds
• Chapter 6: The Neolithic Revolution

---

Cities, kings, and writing — at last.

Welcome back. After a quarter-million years of Homo sapiens and ten thousand years of farming, we are finally about to meet the first kings, the first cities, the first writing, and the first bronze. Three of those four are still with us. Pull up a clay tablet and a stylus. We are about to be able to read what people said to one another, in their own words, for the first time in this book.

What Makes the Bronze Age "Bronze"

The Bronze Age is the archaeological period defined by widespread use of bronze — an alloy of copper with a smaller amount of tin (typically 8–12%) — for tools, weapons, and prestige objects. The term refers specifically to a technological threshold; in any given region, the Bronze Age begins when bronze is in regular use and ends when iron displaces it. The dates therefore vary widely: ~3300 BCE in southwest Asia, ~3000 BCE in the Aegean and Egypt, ~2000 BCE in northern Europe and East Asia, and the term applies awkwardly or not at all in the Americas, sub-Saharan Africa, and Oceania, where parallel metallurgical traditions did not produce widespread bronze in the same window.

Metallurgy origins are older than bronze. Native copper (already-metallic copper found in nature) was hammered into beads and small objects in southwest Asia by ~9000 BCE. Smelted copper — extracted from ore by heating with charcoal in a controlled atmosphere — appears by ~5500 BCE in the Balkans and Anatolia, with sites like Belovode (Serbia) and Çatalhöyük yielding early copper artifacts. The transition to bronze required two further breakthroughs: the recognition that adding tin (or arsenic, in earlier "arsenical bronze") produced a harder, more castable alloy; and the development of long-distance trade networks to bring tin (rare in southwest Asia) from sources in the Taurus Mountains, Cornwall, Afghanistan, or Central Asia. By ~3000 BCE, true tin-bronze was in regular use across the Mediterranean and southwest Asia.

The metallurgical and the social are tightly coupled. Bronze required specialists (smiths, smelters, prospectors), organized labor (mining, charcoal production, transport), trade networks (for tin, copper, fluxes), and patrons (typically kings and temples) who could mobilize the surplus. The technology and the political form coevolve. Bronze-Age states are partly defined by the metallurgical economy they manage.

The Urban Revolution

The urban revolution — V. Gordon Childe's term again — is the transition from agricultural villages to cities: settlements with thousands or tens of thousands of inhabitants, occupational specialization, monumental architecture, formal religion, centralized administration, and (typically) writing. Cities first appear in southern Mesopotamia in the late fourth millennium BCE, with Uruk as the textbook exemplar. Other regions followed on different timetables: the Nile Valley unified into a kingdom-scale polity around 3100 BCE; the Indus Valley produced Harappan cities by ~2600 BCE; the Yellow River basin produced Erlitou by ~1900 BCE; the Liangzhu hydraulic complex on the lower Yangtze, recently brought into clearer focus by archaeological work, dates to ~3300–2300 BCE.

Cities are system phenomena. They aggregate population, surplus, specialists, traders, priests, soldiers, and administrators in a single settlement, generating new social problems (waste, water, defense, dispute resolution, food supply) and new social opportunities (markets, schools, temples, courts). Several structural features tend to recur across early cities, even when they emerged independently:

• Monumental architecture (temples, palaces, walls) requiring labor mobilization.
• Occupational specialization beyond what any village can support.
• Long-distance trade for raw materials (metals, stone, timber) the city cannot produce locally.
• Administrative recordkeeping — eventually writing — to manage flows of grain, tribute, and labor.
• Stratified social hierarchy, often legitimated by religious ideology (sacred kingship).

Once cities exist, the rate of cultural and technological change accelerates sharply. The Bronze Age is, in important part, the consequence of urban life.

Writing Systems: Cuneiform and Hieroglyphics

The most consequential single invention of the urban revolution is writing. The two earliest fully developed writing systems — cuneiform in Mesopotamia and hieroglyphics in Egypt — appeared independently within roughly the same century, around 3300–3100 BCE, in the two regions that were urbanizing most rapidly. (A third, the Indus script, appears slightly later and remains undeciphered; Chinese script appears around 1200 BCE on Shang oracle bones.)

Cuneiform ("wedge-shaped") writing was developed in southern Mesopotamia, probably at Uruk, beginning as a system of pictographic accounting tokens pressed into clay, then evolving into stylized wedge marks made with a reed stylus on flat clay tablets. By 2900 BCE the system had become genuinely linguistic, capable of representing Sumerian (and later Akkadian, Hittite, Elamite, and others) at the level of full grammar and literature. Cuneiform is not an alphabet — it is a logosyllabic system mixing word-signs (logograms) with syllable-signs (syllabograms). A literate Sumerian scribe needed to recognize and produce roughly 600 distinct signs in their basic forms, with many context-dependent variations. Mastery took years. Cuneiform was used to write at least eight different languages over its three-thousand-year history, and the medium of clay survived superbly: there are far more cuneiform tablets in modern museums than there are surviving manuscripts of Greek and Roman literature combined.

Hieroglyphics were the Egyptian writing system, developed around the same time as cuneiform and deployed for monumental and religious inscriptions. Daily administrative writing in Egypt used a more cursive form called hieratic, and from about 650 BCE onward an even more shorthand-like form called demotic. Hieroglyphics combined logograms, phonetic signs (one-, two-, and three-consonant signs), and determinatives — silent classifier signs that disambiguated meaning. The famous Rosetta Stone (196 BCE), which presented the same decree in hieroglyphics, demotic, and Greek, was the key that allowed Jean-François Champollion in 1822 to crack the system after fourteen centuries of illiteracy.

System	Region	Earliest Date	Type	Decipherment
Proto-cuneiform	S. Mesopotamia (Uruk)	~3300 BCE	Pictographic accounting	Read since 19th c.
Cuneiform (Sumerian, Akkadian, etc.)	Mesopotamia	~2900 BCE → 1st c. CE	Logosyllabic	Read since 19th c.
Egyptian hieroglyphics	Egypt	~3200 BCE → 4th c. CE	Mixed phonetic-logographic	Champollion 1822
Indus script	Harappan civilization	~2600 BCE	Unknown	Undeciphered
Chinese (oracle bone script)	Shang dynasty	~1200 BCE	Logographic, ancestor of modern hanzi	Continuously used
Linear A	Minoan Crete	~1800 BCE	Unknown	Undeciphered
Linear B	Mycenaean Greece	~1450 BCE	Syllabic, Greek	Ventris 1952

Two things follow from the appearance of writing. First, writing changes what we can know about a society. From here forward, we can read what people said — laws, contracts, letters, prayers, complaints, grocery lists. The Bronze Age is the first period in this book that has a documentary record alongside its archaeological one. Second, writing changes the society itself. Recordkeeping, codified law, transmissible religious texts, and the bureaucratic state all become possible at scale. The "great organization" of a Bronze Age temple-palace economy is unimaginable without writing.

A small Sumerian moment that aged surprisingly well.

Around 1750 BCE, a Sumerian schoolboy named Iddin-Sin wrote a clay tablet to his mother complaining that other boys had nicer clothes than he did. The tablet survives. So does an Akkadian customer-complaint tablet from a man named Nanni (~1750 BCE) demanding a refund on a substandard copper shipment from a merchant named Ea-nasir — the oldest known formal complaint letter in human history. We have all of this only because writing existed and clay survives. Be quietly grateful to whoever invented the medium. This is one of your superpowers — recognizing that the technology of preservation shapes which voices reach you across millennia.

Mesopotamia: Sumer, Akkad, Babylon

The geographic core of Mesopotamian civilization is the floodplain between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, in what is today southern and central Iraq, with extensions into Syria and southwestern Iran. The plain is hot, agriculturally productive when irrigated, and flat, with no natural defensive features and no internal stone, metal, or large timber. Mesopotamian cities therefore had two structural traits from the start: dependence on irrigation agriculture (organized at the city scale) and reliance on long-distance trade for materials.

Sumer is the southernmost region of Mesopotamia and the first urban civilization in human history. By ~3000 BCE, Sumer contained at least a dozen city-states (Uruk, Ur, Lagash, Nippur, Eridu, Kish, and others), each centered on a temple complex (a ziggurat) dedicated to a patron deity. City-states warred, traded, and intermarried, and city-state hegemony shifted across the third millennium. Sumerian society produced cuneiform writing, monumental temples, the first known epic poetry (the Epic of Gilgamesh, with parts dating to the third millennium and a fully developed Standard Babylonian version by ~1200 BCE), and many of the templates — kingship, temple-economy, written law, scribal schools — that later Mesopotamian polities and their neighbors would inherit.

The first empire in human history — a polity ruling multiple culturally distinct regions through a single political center — was the Akkadian Empire, founded by Sargon of Akkad around 2334 BCE. Sargon, whose origin story (set adrift in a basket as an infant) was likely later embellished, conquered the Sumerian city-states, extended his control north into Syria and east into the Zagros, and established a precedent of imperial rule that subsequent Mesopotamian dynasties would imitate. The Akkadian Empire used the Akkadian language (a Semitic language) as administrative lingua franca alongside Sumerian, and it persisted for roughly 180 years before collapsing around 2154 BCE in a multi-causal crisis that we will return to in the 4.2 ka Event below.

After Akkad came a Sumerian revival (the Third Dynasty of Ur, ~2112–2004 BCE), then a long period of competing city-states, then the rise of Babylonia under the Amorite king Hammurabi (~1792–1750 BCE). Hammurabi's conquests unified southern Mesopotamia under Babylon, and the Code of Hammurabi — a stele of nearly 300 laws inscribed in cuneiform Akkadian, found in 1901 — has become one of the iconic documents of the ancient Near East. The Code includes both procedural and substantive law, distinguishes social classes (free man, commoner, slave), specifies penalties (often retributive, sometimes monetary), and covers commerce, marriage, property, theft, and personal injury.

A reasonable warning. The Code of Hammurabi is not the world's "first written law" (Sumerian codes — the Code of Ur-Nammu, the Code of Lipit-Ishtar — predate it). Nor is it a comprehensive law book; many cases that appear to be missing were probably handled by custom or ad-hoc judicial decision rather than by the Code. What it is is one of the best-preserved written legal documents from the early second millennium BCE, and a window into how Babylonian society conceived of justice, hierarchy, and royal authority.

Egypt: Old, Middle, and New Kingdoms

Egyptian civilization developed along the Nile valley in northeastern Africa, with the annual flood providing reliable irrigation and silt without the back-breaking canal maintenance demanded by the Mesopotamian plain. The Nile's predictability — flooding from snowmelt and monsoon rains in the Ethiopian highlands every summer — made Egypt agriculturally rich and politically coherent in a way Mesopotamia never quite achieved. Egypt's geography also gave it strong natural borders: deserts to east and west, rapids ("cataracts") in the Nile to the south, the Mediterranean to the north. Egypt was less invaded than many of its contemporaries, and its political and cultural institutions enjoyed unusual continuity.

Conventional periodization divides pharaonic Egypt into roughly thirty dynasties, grouped into three major kingdoms with intervening intermediate periods of fragmentation:

Period	Dates (BCE)	Key Features
Predynastic	Before ~3100	Cultural and political precursors; Naqada cultures
Early Dynastic	~3100 – 2686	Unification under Narmer (or Menes); writing emerges
Old Kingdom	~2686 – 2181	Pyramid Age; Djoser, Sneferu, Khufu, Khafre
First Intermediate	~2181 – 2055	Fragmentation; possible 4.2 ka climate stress
Middle Kingdom	~2055 – 1650	Reunification; literary classical age; expansion into Nubia
Second Intermediate	~1650 – 1550	Hyksos rule of Lower Egypt
New Kingdom	~1550 – 1069	Imperial age; Hatshepsut, Thutmose III, Akhenaten, Ramesses II
Third Intermediate	~1069 – 664	Libyan, Nubian, and Saite dynasties

Pharaoh kingship was the central institution. The pharaoh was understood as a divine intermediary between the gods (especially Horus, the falcon god of kingship, and Ra, the sun god) and the people. Royal authority combined religious, military, judicial, and administrative roles. The pharaoh's title and regalia were rich with symbolism: the double crown (red of Lower Egypt, white of Upper Egypt) signaled the unification of the two lands; the crook and flail signaled rulership and agricultural plenty; and the formal title (the "fivefold titulary") ritually located the king within the cosmic order.

Egyptian religion is one of the most elaborated systems of the ancient world, with hundreds of deities, complex mythological cycles, and an intense focus on the afterlife. Major deities included Ra (the sun), Osiris (god of the dead, murdered and resurrected), Isis (goddess and Osiris's consort), Horus (their son and king of the gods), Anubis (jackal god of mummification), Thoth (god of writing and wisdom), Hathor (goddess of love and motherhood), and Set (god of chaos and the desert). The Book of the Dead — actually a collection of funerary spells personalized for individual elite Egyptians — guided the deceased through the underworld and the weighing of the heart, where the heart of the deceased was weighed against the feather of Ma'at (truth/cosmic order) on a divine scale.

Pyramid Construction: Engineering and Politics

Pyramid construction is the iconic Old Kingdom achievement and one of the largest sustained engineering projects in human history. The earliest large pyramids belong to the Third Dynasty (the Step Pyramid of Djoser at Saqqara, ~2670 BCE, designed by Imhotep) and Fourth Dynasty (Sneferu's three pyramids at Meidum and Dahshur, leading up to the Great Pyramid of Khufu at Giza, ~2570 BCE). The Great Pyramid contains an estimated 2.3 million blocks averaging 2.5 metric tons each, originally stood 146.6 m tall (147 m), and was the tallest human-made structure in the world for nearly four thousand years.

The popular myth that the pyramids were built by enslaved Hebrews (or, in still cruder versions, by aliens) is archaeologically wrong on both counts. Ongoing excavations at the workers' villages near Giza have revealed extensive labor housing, bakeries, breweries, medical care areas, and the remains of substantial food allocations including cattle, sheep, and goats. The pyramids appear to have been built primarily by paid, well-fed Egyptian laborers — both full-time professionals and seasonal workers contributing labor as a form of taxation, especially during the inundation when farming was impossible. Building a pyramid was simultaneously a religious, political, and economic project: it employed the population during the flood, redistributed grain through wages, projected royal authority, and secured the king's afterlife.

Diagram: A Mesopotamian and Egyptian Timeline

Mesopotamia and Egypt — parallel timeline

Type: timeline sim-id: mesopotamia-egypt-parallel-timeline
Library: vis-timeline
Status: Specified

Learning objective (Bloom: Understanding/Analyzing): The student can correlate the dynasties and political phases of Mesopotamia and Egypt, identify the points of contact (Hyksos, Amarna correspondence, etc.), and recognize the 4.2 ka Event as a moment of synchronous stress in both regions.

Visual structure. A parallel two-track horizontal timeline. Top track: Egyptian periodization (Predynastic, Early Dynastic, Old Kingdom, FIP, Middle Kingdom, SIP, New Kingdom, TIP). Bottom track: Mesopotamian periodization (Uruk, Early Dynastic, Akkadian Empire, Ur III, Old Babylonian, Mitanni / Kassite, Middle Assyrian, Neo-Assyrian). Cross-track lines show contemporaneity events: 4.2 ka Event (~2200 BCE) marked across both tracks; Hyksos rule of Egypt; Amarna correspondence (~1350 BCE) connecting Akhenaten's Egypt to Mitanni and Babylonia.

Interactivity. (1) Hovering reveals capital city, dominant language(s), defining king(s). (2) Clicking opens a side panel with key inventions, monuments, and primary sources. (3) Toggle to overlay climate proxies (Δ¹⁸O, drought indicators) showing the 4.2 ka Event and other climatic episodes.

Default layout. Responsive vis-timeline; minimum height 500 px. Time scale linear (BCE).

Color palette. Egyptian dynasties #F9A825 (gold); Mesopotamian periods #1565C0 (blue); cross-track events #B71C1C (red); climate overlay #6A1B9A (purple).

Implementation: vis-timeline with two grouped tracks; data in data.json. Deploy at docs/sims/mesopotamia-egypt-parallel-timeline/.

The Yamnaya, Steppe Pastoralism, and Proto-Indo-European

While Mesopotamia and Egypt were urbanizing, a very different transformation was unfolding on the Pontic-Caspian steppe north of the Black and Caspian Seas. Beginning around 3300 BCE, a population of steppe pastoralists known archaeologically as the Yamnaya culture was reorganizing around mobile herding of cattle, sheep, and (decisively) horses. The horse had been domesticated earlier on the steppe — recent ancient-DNA work points to the lower Volga-Don region around 4200 BCE for the modern horse lineage — and the combination of horses, wheeled vehicles, and dairying produced a mobile economy of unusual reach.

Between roughly 3300 and 2600 BCE, descendants of the Yamnaya migrated westward into Europe and eastward into Central Asia and South Asia, leaving genetic signatures detectable in modern populations across both regions. Ancient-DNA studies published since 2015 (the David Reich lab and collaborators have been particularly influential) have documented this Yamnaya migration in unprecedented detail. The Corded Ware culture of central and northern Europe (~2900–2350 BCE) shows substantial Yamnaya ancestry; in some regions, ancient DNA shows that Yamnaya-derived males contributed disproportionately to subsequent populations, while local Neolithic-derived ancestry persists more on the female side — a pattern consistent with male-biased migration and admixture.

The linguistic implication is one of the major payoffs of the genetic data. Proto-Indo-European — the reconstructed common ancestor of the Indo-European language family that includes Sanskrit, Greek, Latin, the Germanic, Slavic, Celtic, and Indo-Iranian languages, and many others — has been linked to the Yamnaya horizon by independent linguistic, archaeological, and now genetic evidence. The current best inference (the "Steppe Hypothesis" articulated most prominently by Marija Gimbutas and revised by David Anthony) is that the Yamnaya carried Proto-Indo-European westward and eastward, where it diversified into the language families that today are spoken by roughly 3.2 billion people. This is not a settled question — the older "Anatolian Hypothesis" places PIE in southern Anatolia ~9000 BCE — but the post-2015 ancient-DNA evidence has substantially strengthened the steppe model.

What ancient DNA does for languages.

For most of the twentieth century, theories about Proto-Indo-European depended on a tense triangulation between comparative linguistics (reconstructing the parent language from its descendants) and archaeology (which culture do we associate with the speakers?). The match was educated guesswork. Since 2015, ancient DNA has added a third leg to the stool — letting us trace the actual movements of people whose languages we can also reconstruct. When you see a confident claim about prehistoric language spread (Indo-European, Bantu, Austronesian), check whether it integrates the ancient-DNA evidence published in the last decade. This is one of your superpowers — recognizing when a field has acquired a new instrument that changes what counts as evidence.

Liangzhu: An Early Hydraulic State in China

While Mesopotamia and Egypt are the textbook standard-bearers, recent excavations have substantially raised the profile of the Liangzhu Culture of the lower Yangtze River basin, which flourished from roughly 3300 to 2300 BCE. The Liangzhu site complex centers on a walled urban core covering some 290 hectares, surrounded by an elaborate hydraulic engineering system of dams, dykes, and canals managing seasonal flooding across a much larger landscape. The hydraulic system, dated firmly to the third millennium BCE, is one of the oldest large-scale water-management projects in the world.

Liangzhu produced extraordinary jade objects — most famously the bi disks and cong tubes, often inscribed with stylized faces ("animal masks") that may represent shamanic or cosmological figures. Liangzhu society was clearly stratified, with elite tombs containing dozens of jade objects and commoner tombs containing few or none. The site was abandoned around 2300 BCE under conditions that probably involved both climatic stress and the same kind of demographic and political reorganization seen across Eurasia at the close of the third millennium BCE. Liangzhu's UNESCO World Heritage inscription in 2019 reflects its growing recognition as a primary urban civilization on par with the better-known Old World examples.

The 4.2 ka Event

Around 4,200 years ago (~2200 BCE), paleoclimate proxies record a relatively sudden, severe, and globally distributed drought event lasting roughly 200–300 years. Sediment cores from the Mediterranean, ice cores from Greenland, lake records in Africa, and speleothems (cave deposits) in Asia all register the same signal. The 4.2 ka Event correlates with a striking range of political and social disruptions in the same window:

• The collapse of the Akkadian Empire in Mesopotamia (~2154 BCE).
• The end of the Old Kingdom in Egypt and the onset of the First Intermediate Period (~2181 BCE).
• The decline of the Liangzhu Culture in China (~2300 BCE) and disruption in the Yellow River basin.
• Stress on the Indus Valley civilization, contributing to its eventual decline (~1900 BCE).
• Disruption in the Aegean Early Bronze Age and parts of the eastern Mediterranean.

The 4.2 ka Event is a powerful illustration of systems thinking applied to history: a single environmental shock can produce simultaneous (or near-simultaneous) crises across societies that had no political contact with each other, because each is independently dependent on rainfall, river flows, and agricultural outputs that are themselves climate-sensitive. The event is so well documented that the International Commission on Stratigraphy formally designated 4200 BP as the boundary between the "Northgrippian" and "Meghalayan" subdivisions of the Holocene — making the 4.2 ka Event the rare environmental episode that actually defines a chunk of the geological time scale.

A caution. Climate is one factor among several. The Akkadian collapse also had political and military causes; the Egyptian First Intermediate Period had social and dynastic dimensions; the Indus decline involved tectonic changes in river courses as well as drought. The 4.2 ka Event is a stressor, not a single-cause explanation. But as we will see again with the Late Bronze Age Collapse, the Late Antique Little Ice Age, and the Justinianic Plague, climate and disease are now first-class historical actors in pre-1200 history, not background scenery.

Putting the First Civilizations in Frame

By the close of the third millennium BCE, the world had its first urban-literate civilizations in Mesopotamia, Egypt, and East Asia, supported by bronze metallurgy, irrigation agriculture, long-distance trade, and the institutional inventions of writing, codified law, and divine kingship. It also had a major migration event (Yamnaya westward and eastward) that would seed the languages of Eurasia, and a climate shock (the 4.2 ka Event) that simultaneously stressed multiple early states. The next chapter picks up the story across Asia and the Aegean — the Indus Valley, Shang and Zhou China, Minoan and Mycenaean civilization, and the Late Bronze Age international system that ended catastrophically around 1200 BCE.

• The Bronze Age is defined by widespread bronze (copper-tin alloy) use and the political-economic systems it required.
• The urban revolution produced Uruk, the Liangzhu hydraulic complex, Memphis, Harappan cities, and others.
• Cuneiform and hieroglyphics emerged ~3300–3100 BCE and made the documentary record possible.
• Sumer, the Akkadian Empire, and Babylonia are successive Mesopotamian political forms; the Code of Hammurabi is a Babylonian high-water mark.
• Egyptian civilization divides into Old, Middle, and New Kingdoms; the pyramids are an Old Kingdom phenomenon and were built by paid Egyptian laborers.
• Yamnaya migration (~3300–2600 BCE) carried Proto-Indo-European west and east, documented in detail by post-2015 ancient DNA.
• The 4.2 ka Event stressed multiple early civilizations near-simultaneously, illustrating climate as a first-class historical actor.

You can read the past now.

A pyramid, a ziggurat, a Hammurabi stele, an oracle bone, a jade cong, an Akkadian customer-complaint tablet. Each of these is a primary source you can now read with informed eyes, and each connects back to the analytical tools you set up in Chapter 1. From here forward, when a textbook says "the Egyptians believed" or "the Sumerians thought," you have the right to ask which Egyptians, which century, and how do we know? Onward — to a Bronze Age that gets even more interconnected, and then catastrophically falls apart.