SKOS Relation Triple Builder
Run the SKOS Relation Triple Builder MicroSim Fullscreen
About This MicroSim
SKOS gives you three relations for linking concepts:
| Relation | Points to | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Broader | A more general concept | Depth-First Search → broader → Graph Traversal |
| Narrower | A more specific concept | Graph Traversal → narrower → Depth-First Search |
| Related | An associated concept, no hierarchy implied | SKOS → related → Dublin Core Metadata |
Recognizing those definitions is easy. Applying them is where people slip, because the
direction is half the answer. Broader and narrower describe the same hierarchy read from
opposite ends. Getting the relation type right while pointing the arrow the wrong way produces
a triple that asserts the exact opposite of what you meant — and a validator will happily
accept it, because it is structurally well-formed.
This MicroSim gives you six concept pairs from this book's own vocabulary and asks you to build
each triple. The Swap button flips which concept the arrow starts from, and the correct
answer inverts along with it: broader becomes narrower, while related — being symmetric —
stays related whichever way you point it.
How to Use
- Read the two concept boxes and the dashed placeholder arrow between them.
- Decide whether the arrow, as drawn, should be labeled Broader, Narrower, or Related.
- If the arrow points the wrong way for the relation you have in mind, click Swap first.
- Click a relation button to commit. The arrow solidifies gold (correct) or red (incorrect), labeled with the relation you chose, and the feedback banner shows the correct triple plus a one-sentence explanation.
- Click Next Pair to advance. After all six, you get a scorecard showing which pairs you answered correctly on the first try.
The progress dots along the top fill in green for a first-try correct answer and red otherwise, so you can see your run at a glance.
Iframe Embed Code
You can add this MicroSim to any web page by adding this to your HTML:
1 2 3 4 | |
Lesson Plan
Audience
Instructional designers, curriculum developers, and educational technologists working with concept dependency graphs.
Duration
10–15 minutes
Prerequisites
Learners should know what SKOS is and have seen the definitions of broader, narrower, and related from Chapter 22.
Activities
- First run, no help (5 min): Learners complete all six pairs without discussion. Record the first-try score.
- The swap discussion (5 min): Focus on pair 2. Ask half the room to answer it as drawn and
half to swap first. Both can be correct — with different relation labels. Ask what that
implies about storing a SKOS triple in a database: is
broadera property of the pair, or of the ordered pair? - Why related is different (3 min): Pairs 3 and 6 are
related. Ask what happens to those when you swap, and why symmetry makesrelatedcheaper to store but weaker to reason with.
Assessment
Learners can:
- Select the correct SKOS relation for an unseen concept pair.
- Orient the arrow correctly, and recognize that a right label on a backward arrow is wrong.
- Explain why
broaderandnarrowerare inverses andrelatedis symmetric. - Distinguish a hierarchical relation from an associative one for a pair of sibling concepts.
Related Concepts
- SKOS — the vocabulary these three relations come from
- Broader / Narrower — inverse hierarchical relations
- Related — the symmetric associative relation
- Dublin Core Metadata — a sibling standard, used in pair 3
- Concept Taxonomy — what a well-formed set of broader/narrower triples builds up to
References
- Chapter 22: Concept Metadata and Semantic Labeling - The chapter this MicroSim supports.
- SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System - Wikipedia's overview of the W3C standard.
- SKOS Reference - The W3C specification defining skos:broader, skos:narrower, and skos:related.
- Dublin Core - The metadata standard used as the
relatedexample in pair 3. - vis-network Documentation - The graph rendering library used to build this MicroSim.