Skip to content

The Knowledge Framework Applied to AOKs

Run the The Knowledge Framework Applied to AOKs MicroSim Fullscreen
Edit in the p5.js Editor

About This MicroSim

This interactive MicroSim helps students compare the eight Areas of Knowledge using the four dimensions of the Knowledge Framework.. It supports the learning objectives in Chapter: Areas of Knowledge and Mathematical Methods.

How to Use

Use the interactive controls below the drawing area to explore the visualization. Hover over elements for additional information and click to see detailed descriptions.

Iframe Embed Code

You can add this MicroSim to any web page by adding this to your HTML:

1
2
3
4
<iframe src="https://dmccreary.github.io/theory-of-knowledge/sims/knowledge-framework-aok/main.html"
        height="450px"
        width="100%"
        scrolling="no"></iframe>

Lesson Plan

Grade Level

9-12 (High School / IB TOK)

Duration

15-20 minutes

Prerequisites

  • Familiarity with the eight IB Areas of Knowledge (Mathematics, Natural Sciences, Human Sciences, History, The Arts, Ethics, Religious Knowledge Systems, Indigenous Knowledge Systems)
  • Basic understanding of what the TOK Knowledge Framework is and its purpose
  • Ability to distinguish between different types of knowledge claims

Learning Objectives

  • Compare at least two Areas of Knowledge across multiple dimensions of the Knowledge Framework (scope, methodology, historical development, links to personal knowledge)
  • Analyze how the same framework dimension manifests differently across AOKs

Activities

  1. Exploration (5 min): Click on individual cells in the 8 AOKs x 4 dimensions matrix to read detailed descriptions. Start by selecting one AOK you are familiar with (e.g., Natural Sciences) and read across all four dimensions. Then select a contrasting AOK (e.g., The Arts) and do the same. Note the differences.
  2. Guided Practice (10 min): Use the highlight feature to focus on one AOK at a time. Compare Mathematics and The Arts across the "Methodology" dimension: how does each AOK produce and validate knowledge? Then compare them on "Scope": what kinds of questions does each AOK address? Create a T-chart listing at least three specific differences. Discuss: are some dimensions more useful than others for distinguishing between AOKs?
  3. Assessment (5 min): Choose two AOKs not yet compared in class and write a paragraph analyzing their similarities and differences across at least two Knowledge Framework dimensions. Use specific TOK vocabulary (e.g., "knowledge claim," "methodology," "scope," "shared knowledge").

Assessment

  • Accurately describes at least two AOKs using the Knowledge Framework dimensions
  • Identifies meaningful similarities and differences rather than surface-level observations
  • Uses TOK vocabulary appropriately when comparing AOKs

Quiz

Test your understanding with this review question.

1. When comparing the Natural Sciences and History using the Knowledge Framework, which statement best captures a key methodological difference?

  1. Natural Sciences use evidence while History relies on speculation
  2. Natural Sciences use repeatable experiments while History interprets unique, non-repeatable events through evidence
  3. History is subjective and therefore less reliable than the Natural Sciences
  4. Both disciplines use identical methods but apply them to different subject matter
Show Answer

The correct answer is B. The key methodological difference is that natural scientists can design controlled, repeatable experiments to test hypotheses, whereas historians must interpret evidence from events that occurred once and cannot be replicated. Both are rigorous disciplines with established methodologies, but their approaches to evidence and verification differ fundamentally due to the nature of their subject matter.

Concept Tested: Methodological comparison across Areas of Knowledge

References

  1. International Baccalaureate Organization. (2022). Theory of Knowledge Guide. IBO.
  2. Dombrowski, E., Rotenberg, L., & Bick, M. (2013). Theory of Knowledge Course Companion. Oxford University Press.
  3. Lagemaat, R. van de. (2015). Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma. Cambridge University Press.