Skip to content

Ways of Knowing and Their Interactions

Run the Ways of Knowing and Their Interactions MicroSim Fullscreen
Edit in the p5.js Editor

About This MicroSim

This interactive MicroSim helps students compare how sense perception, emotion, intuition, memory, and imagination interact when a knower encounters a knowledge claim.. It supports the learning objectives in Chapter: Knowledge and the Knower.

How to Use

Use the interactive controls below the drawing area to explore the visualization. Hover over elements for additional information and click to see detailed descriptions.

Iframe Embed Code

You can add this MicroSim to any web page by adding this to your HTML:

1
2
3
4
<iframe src="https://dmccreary.github.io/theory-of-knowledge/sims/ways-of-knowing-web/main.html"
        height="450px"
        width="100%"
        scrolling="no"></iframe>

Lesson Plan

Grade Level

9-12 (High School / IB TOK)

Duration

15-20 minutes

Prerequisites

  • Familiarity with the five Ways of Knowing: Sense Perception, Emotion, Reason, Language, and Intuition
  • Basic understanding that knowledge claims can be supported by multiple WoKs simultaneously
  • Exposure to the idea that WoKs can reinforce or conflict with each other

Learning Objectives

  • Analyze how multiple Ways of Knowing interact when encountering a knowledge claim by tracing connections in the WoK web for specific scenarios

Activities

  1. Exploration (5 min): Select the "Smelling Freshly Baked Bread" scenario in the sim. Click on the Sense Perception node and observe which other WoK nodes light up and what connections are highlighted. Then click each of the remaining four WoK nodes to see their contributions: How does Emotion connect to the sensory experience? What role does Memory/Intuition play? Does Language shape how you describe the experience?
  2. Guided Practice (10 min): Trace the full web of interactions for this scenario. In small groups, rank the five WoKs from most to least influential for this particular knowledge experience. Then select a contrasting scenario (e.g., "Solving a Mathematical Proof" or "Judging Whether a News Story Is True"). Create the same ranking for the new scenario. Compare your two rankings: Which WoKs shifted position? Discuss why different types of knowledge experiences activate the WoK web differently.
  3. Assessment (5 min): Propose a scenario where two WoKs produce conflicting knowledge claims (e.g., "Your intuition says a friend is lying, but their words and reasoning seem sound"). Map the conflict on the WoK web, identifying which connections support each side. Write 2-3 sentences explaining how a knower might resolve the conflict.

Assessment

  • Students identify at least three active WoK connections for a given scenario with specific explanations
  • Rankings are supported by reasoning about why certain WoKs dominate in different contexts
  • Conflict analysis demonstrates understanding that WoKs can produce contradictory knowledge claims

Quiz

Test your understanding with this review question.

1. When you smell freshly baked bread and immediately feel happy and recall your grandmother's kitchen, which combination of Ways of Knowing is MOST directly involved?

  1. Reason and Language
  2. Sense Perception, Emotion, and Intuition (memory)
  3. Language and Sense Perception only
  4. Reason, Language, and Emotion
Show Answer

The correct answer is B. The smell activates Sense Perception directly. The immediate feeling of happiness is an Emotional response. The involuntary recall of your grandmother's kitchen involves Intuition and memory -- it is not a reasoned inference but a spontaneous association. Reason and Language may become involved later (e.g., when you describe the experience or reflect on it), but the initial knowledge experience is driven by the interaction of Sense Perception, Emotion, and Intuition.

Concept Tested: Interaction of Ways of Knowing in experiential knowledge

References

  1. IB Theory of Knowledge Guide, International Baccalaureate Organization, 2022.
  2. Dombrowski, Eileen, Lena Rotenberg, and Mimi Bick. Theory of Knowledge. Oxford University Press, 2013.