Three-Context Comparison¶
Learning Objective¶
Compare K-12, higher education, and corporate L&D xAPI deployment contexts across regulatory burden, deployment timeline, and analytics permissibility.
- Bloom Level: Evaluate
- Bloom Verb: Compare
- Library: p5.js
Specification¶
The full specification below is extracted from Chapter 14: Privacy, Compliance, and Organizational Context.
Type: interactive-infographic
**sim-id:** three-context-comparison<br/>
**Library:** p5.js<br/>
**Status:** Specified
**Learning objective (Bloom — Evaluating):** Compare K-12, higher education, and corporate L&D xAPI deployment contexts across regulatory burden, deployment timeline, and analytics permissibility.
**Layout:** Three vertical columns, one per context; a side panel below showing the selected context's full profile.
**Each column shows:**
- Context name in a header bar (K-12, Higher Ed, Corporate L&D)
- A 4-axis radar mini-chart: regulatory burden, deployment timeline, analytics permissibility, vendor flexibility
- Top three regulatory frameworks that apply (FERPA, COPPA, state laws / FERPA, IRB / GDPR, country labor law)
- A one-line summary
**Side panel shows:**
- Full context description
- Typical procurement path
- Common analytics use cases
- Common pitfalls
**Interaction:**
- Click a column to update the side panel
- Toggle "Add EU enrollees" — overlays GDPR's additional constraints on each context
**Default canvas:** 1100×600px, responsive.
Implementation: p5.js for the columns, radar charts, and selection state; HTML overlay for the side panel.