Skip to content

Trade Argument Evaluator

Run the Trade Argument Evaluator MicroSim Fullscreen
Edit in the p5.js Editor

About This MicroSim

This MicroSim presents eight common trade policy arguments from politicians, activists, economists, and policy analysts, and challenges students to evaluate each claim using critical economic reasoning. For each argument, students click to select relevant red flags from a list of 15 options (such as "Correlation does not equal causation," "Ignores consumer benefits," or "Misunderstands who pays tariffs"), then choose a verdict: Accurate, Misleading, Needs Context, or Valid Concern. After checking their answer, a detailed economic analysis explains the nuances behind the claim. Arguments are shuffled randomly for replayability.

How to Use

  1. Read the Claim -- Each claim card shows a trade-related policy argument along with its source (Politician, Activist, Economist, etc.).
  2. Select Red Flags -- Click on any red flags from the grid that apply to the current argument. Selected flags are highlighted. Correct flags are revealed in green after you check your answer.
  3. Choose Your Evaluation -- Click one of the four verdict buttons: Accurate, Misleading, Needs Context, or Valid Concern.
  4. Check Your Answer -- Click the blue "Check Answer" button to reveal whether you were correct, see the best verdict, and read a detailed economic analysis of the claim.
  5. Next Argument -- Click "Next Argument" to advance to the next randomly ordered claim. Your score is tracked at the top left.
  6. Start Over -- Click "Start Over" to reshuffle all arguments and reset your score.

Iframe Embed Code

You can add this MicroSim to any web page by adding this to your HTML:

<iframe src="https://dmccreary.github.io/economics-course/sims/trade-evaluator/main.html"
        height="552px"
        width="100%"
        scrolling="no"></iframe>

Lesson Plan

Grade Level

9-12 (High School Economics)

Duration

10-15 minutes

Prerequisites

  • Understanding of international trade concepts (imports, exports, tariffs, trade deficits)
  • Familiarity with comparative advantage and its implications
  • Basic critical thinking skills for evaluating arguments

Activities

  1. Exploration (5 min): Have students work through the first 3-4 arguments individually, selecting red flags and verdicts before checking answers. Ask them to note which types of claims are most commonly "Misleading" vs. "Needs Context" vs. "Valid Concern."
  2. Guided Practice (5 min): Display one argument on screen and have the class debate it before checking. For example, the tariff claim -- ask students who they think pays for tariffs and why. Compare their reasoning to the simulator's analysis. Discuss why "Needs Context" is often the most accurate verdict for complex economic claims.
  3. Assessment (5 min): After completing all arguments, students write a brief reflection identifying the most common logical error they saw in trade policy claims and explaining one strategy for evaluating trade arguments they encounter in news media.

Assessment

  • Can the student identify logical fallacies and oversimplifications in trade policy arguments?
  • Can the student distinguish between claims that are outright misleading vs. those that have a valid kernel but lack context?
  • Does the student demonstrate the ability to apply economic reasoning to evaluate real-world policy claims?

References

  1. Free trade - Wikipedia
  2. Protectionism - Wikipedia
  3. Trade Policy - Investopedia