Type: diagram
Purpose: Illustrate the complex integration challenges of traditional CMDB implementations showing data flows from multiple sources
Components to show:
- Center: CMDB (large orange cylinder/database shape)
- Around CMDB: Multiple source systems (arranged in circular pattern)
- Network Discovery Tools (top-left, purple box)
- Server Monitoring (top, blue box)
- Application Performance Management (top-right, cyan box)
- Service Desk / Ticketing (right, green box)
- Change Management System (bottom-right, yellow box)
- Asset Management DB (bottom, red box)
- Cloud Management Platforms (bottom-left, teal box)
- Manual Entry / Spreadsheets (left, gray box)
- Integration Layer (dotted circle around CMDB, light gray)
- Output Systems (arranged in outer circle)
- Change Impact Analysis (top-left)
- Incident Management (top)
- Capacity Planning (top-right)
- Compliance Reporting (right)
Connections:
- Solid arrows from source systems to CMDB (labeled with "Push" or "Pull")
- Dotted arrows from CMDB to output systems (labeled with "Query")
- Red "X" symbols on several arrows indicating common integration failures
- Numbers on arrows indicating "integration points" (e.g., "API v2.1", "XML Feed", "CSV Import")
Visual style: System integration diagram with emphasis on complexity
Labels:
- "Discovery Sources" label over source systems
- "ETL / Integration Layer" on dotted circle
- "Consuming Processes" label over output systems
- "Manual Reconciliation Required" label with arrow pointing to conflicts
- "Data Quality Issues" label on arrows with red X
Annotations:
- Small callout boxes showing common problems:
- "Conflicting data from multiple sources"
- "Stale data (discovery runs weekly)"
- "Schema mismatches"
- "Integration breaks with version upgrades"
Color scheme:
- Various colors for source systems (to show diversity)
- Orange for CMDB (central focus)
- Gray for integration layer (showing it as overhead)
- Red for failure points
Implementation: Diagram tool (Lucidchart, Draw.io) or SVG with clear labeling