FAQ Quality Report¶

Generated: 2026-09-25

Overall Statistics¶

Total Questions: 92
Overall Quality Score: 85/100
Content Completeness Score (pre-generation assessment): 100/100
Concept Coverage: 60% (181/300 concepts, case-insensitive match against the learning graph's canonical concept labels)

Category Breakdown¶

Getting Started Questions¶

Questions: 14
Share of FAQ: 15.2%
Dominant Bloom's levels: Remember / Understand
Typical answer length: ~120–175 words

Core Concepts¶

Questions: 26
Share of FAQ: 28.3%
Dominant Bloom's levels: Understand / Apply, with Remember and Analyze represented
Typical answer length: ~90–150 words
Covers all 11 CO.STARTERS Canvas blocks and all 13 non-foundational taxonomy categories (CANV, CUST, PROB, SOL, ALT, VALU, INTV, VALID, MSG, DIST, REV, FIN, LAUNCH) with at least one question each

Technical Detail Questions¶

Questions: 20
Share of FAQ: 21.7%
Dominant Bloom's levels: Remember / Understand
Typical answer length: ~95–140 words
Draws terminology directly from glossary.md, with a secondary link into the chapter that develops the term

Common Challenges Questions¶

Questions: 12
Share of FAQ: 13.0%
Dominant Bloom's levels: Apply / Analyze
Typical answer length: ~90–160 words
Framed as troubleshooting scenarios ("why do my interviews...", "what if...")

Best Practice Questions¶

Questions: 12
Share of FAQ: 13.0%
Dominant Bloom's levels: Apply / Evaluate
Typical answer length: ~95–150 words
Framed as "how should I..." / "what's the best way to..." recommendations

Advanced Topics¶

Questions: 8
Share of FAQ: 8.7%
Dominant Bloom's levels: Analyze / Evaluate / Create
Typical answer length: ~100–150 words
Covers cross-chapter synthesis (multi-channel strategy, B2B adaptation, extending the launch plan into an operational roadmap)

Bloom's Taxonomy Distribution¶

Actual (whole-FAQ) vs. a per-category blended target (each category's own target distribution from the skill's rubric, weighted by that category's share of the 92 questions):

Level	Actual	Blended Target	Deviation
Remember	17.4%	22.6%	-5.2%
Understand	34.8%	31.3%	+3.5%
Apply	22.8%	24.2%	-1.4%
Analyze	13.0%	14.1%	-1.1%
Evaluate	7.6%	4.6%	+3.0%
Create	4.3%	3.3%	+1.0%

Total absolute deviation: 15.2%, within the 11–20% band.

Overall Bloom's Score: 20/25 (good distribution, understand-heavy relative to blended target but within tolerance)

Answer Quality Analysis¶

Examples: 40/92 (43%) — Target: 40%+ ✓
Links: 92/92 (100%) — Target: 60%+ ✓ (every answer links to at least one chapter, the glossary, a MicroSim, or a front-matter page; zero anchor-fragment links)
Avg Length: 107.5 words — Target: 100-300 ✓ (min 76 words, max ~200 words; no answer is a one-liner and none pads past the point)
Complete Answers: 92/92 (100%) ✓ — every answer stands alone and directly addresses its question

Answer Quality Score: 25/25

Concept Coverage¶

Methodology: each of the 300 canonical concept labels from learning-graph.csv is matched (case-insensitive, word-boundary) against the full FAQ text. This is a conservative proxy — a concept can be genuinely explained without ever using its exact canonical label — so this number understates true pedagogical coverage.

Covered: 181 of 300 concepts (60%). Coverage concentrates on exactly the concepts that matter most: all 10 of the learning graph's highest-indegree ("most depended-upon") concepts are covered — Target Customer, Thirty-Day Launch Plan, Lean Validation, Discovery Interview, Business Idea, Solution Definition, Value Proposition, Problem Definition, Revenue Model, and Messaging Framework — and every one of the 4 foundational (no-prerequisite) concepts is covered. All 11 canvas blocks are named explicitly.

Not covered (119 concepts): every single uncovered concept has an indegree of 0 in the learning graph — meaning no other concept in the course depends on it. These are leaf-level elaborations of an already-covered parent idea (for example, Emotional Benefit and Functional Benefit elaborate the already-covered Customer Benefit/Benefit Block; Interview Scheduling and Interview Sample Size elaborate the already-covered Discovery Interview). See FAQ Coverage Gaps for the full breakdown by taxonomy category.

Coverage Score: 20/30 (60–69% band)

Organization Quality¶

Logical categorization: ✓ — 6 categories matching the skill's standard structure, with Core Concepts internally organized by the book's 13 non-foundational taxonomy categories in course order
Progressive difficulty: ✓ — Bloom's level rises category by category, from mostly Remember/Understand in Getting Started to mostly Analyze/Evaluate/Create in Advanced Topics
No duplicates: ✓ — verified programmatically; no two questions cover the same concept pair from the same angle
Clear questions: ✓ — every question is phrased as a real, searchable question and uses the book's own terminology

Organization Score: 20/20

Overall Quality Score: 85/100¶

Coverage: 20/30
Bloom's Distribution: 20/25
Answer Quality: 25/25
Organization: 20/20

Recommendations¶

High Priority¶

None. All high-centrality (high-indegree) concepts are already covered, and all four foundational concepts are covered.

Medium Priority¶

If the FAQ is expanded later, the SOL (Solution Design, 13 uncovered), CUST/INTV/MSG/VALU (12 uncovered each) taxonomy categories have the most remaining leaf-concept elaborations — see FAQ Coverage Gaps for candidates.
The Remember/Understand ratio in Core Concepts leans slightly Understand-heavy relative to the category's 20%/40% target; a handful of additional "What is [X]?" definitional questions would rebalance it without changing the total question count much.

Low Priority¶

Consider 2–3 more Advanced Topics questions if the book adds new cross-chapter capstone material in a future edition.
As new chapters or MicroSims are added, re-run the concept-coverage check in faq-coverage-gaps.md rather than assuming this report stays current.