Skip to content

Quiz: Digital and School Safety

Test your understanding of digital relationship boundaries, responding to online harm, and school safety practices with these review questions.

1. Which national resource does the chapter name specifically for reporting a non-consensual image involving a minor?

  1. A local police department's general phone line
  2. A school's anonymous tip line only
  3. The NCMEC CyberTipline at report.cybertip.org
  4. A social media platform's advertising department
Show Answer

The correct answer is C. The chapter names report.cybertip.org, the NCMEC CyberTipline, as the national resource built specifically for any non-consensual image involving a minor, including situations where the person who shared it is also a minor. This is one specific step within the broader five-step response sequence for online harm.

Concept Tested: Responding To Online Threats And Harmful Content

2. Why does the chapter describe surveillance behaviors, like checking a partner's phone without permission, as functioning as control rather than care?

  1. Because trust is the willingness to not verify, so constantly checking replaces trust rather than building it
  2. Because surveillance behaviors always improve relationship communication
  3. Because checking a partner's phone is required for a relationship to be considered serious
  4. Because surveillance has no documented connection to jealousy or conflict
Show Answer

The correct answer is A. The chapter states directly that trust, by definition, is the willingness to not verify, and that constantly checking replaces trust rather than building it. Research is also cited linking surveillance behaviors to higher rates of jealousy, conflict, and in more severe cases, controlling or abusive patterns.

Concept Tested: Social Media Effects On Boundaries

3. According to the chapter's comparison table, what signal distinguishes a situation that should be treated as an emergency from one that should be handled through reporting or blocking?

  1. Whether the post received a large number of comments
  2. Whether the situation happened on a well-known platform
  3. Whether the person posting has many online followers
  4. The presence of a credible, specific threat of violence naming a person, location, and some indication of intent or planning
Show Answer

The correct answer is D. The chapter's decision framework identifies a credible, specific threat of violence, one that names a person, a location, and some indication of intent or planning, as the deciding signal for emergency escalation. Vague, non-specific, or non-violent harmful content is generally handled through platform reporting and telling a trusted adult instead.

Concept Tested: Online Emergency Response

4. Why does the chapter say digital permanence "changes the stakes" of a bad moment in a relationship?

  1. Because digital messages automatically delete themselves after a set time
  2. Because a single angry message sent digitally can be screenshotted and preserved in a way a spoken argument cannot
  3. Because digital communication has no lasting effect on relationships
  4. Because screenshots can only be taken by the original sender
Show Answer

The correct answer is B. The chapter explains that a message sent in an angry moment can be preserved through a screenshot in a way a spoken argument cannot be, changing how much thought a person needs to put into communicating anger digitally compared to in person.

Concept Tested: Digital Content Effects On Relationships

5. A student is being harassed online by a former partner. What is the correct first step in the chapter's response sequence?

  1. Stop responding to the person responsible, since engaging or arguing rarely stops the behavior and can escalate it
  2. Immediately delete all messages to avoid seeing them again
  3. Post publicly about the situation to warn mutual friends
  4. Wait to see if the harassment stops on its own before taking any action
Show Answer

The correct answer is A. The chapter's five-step response sequence begins with stopping engagement with the person responsible, since arguing or pleading rarely stops the behavior and can escalate it. This is followed by saving evidence, reporting through the platform, reporting to NCMEC if applicable, and telling a trusted adult.

Concept Tested: Responding To Online Threats And Harmful Content

6. A student overhears a classmate, in what sounds like a joking tone, describe a specific grievance against another student and mention thinking a lot about a past violent incident. What should the student do?

  1. Ignore it since it was said in a joking tone
  2. Confront the classmate directly to find out if they were serious
  3. Report it to a trusted adult, staff member, or anonymous tip line immediately, since it is not the student's job to judge how serious the comment is
  4. Wait to see if the classmate says something similar again before reporting
Show Answer

The correct answer is C. The chapter's warning-sign framework specifically identifies a named grievance combined with escalating fascination with past violence as concerning categories, and states clearly that judging severity belongs to trained adults, not students. Reporting every time, regardless of tone or personal judgment, is the consistent guidance.

Concept Tested: School Shooting Preparedness

7. During a lockdown drill, which action matches standard procedure as described in the chapter?

  1. Following staff to a designated outdoor evacuation location
  2. Waiting for an all-clear from an unverified text message from a friend
  3. Announcing your location loudly to alert others nearby
  4. Moving out of sight of doors and windows, silencing your phone, and waiting for an official all-clear from law enforcement or staff
Show Answer

The correct answer is D. Standard lockdown procedure described in the chapter includes getting out of sight, silencing your phone, staying quiet, and waiting for an official all-clear from law enforcement or the staff member in charge, never from an unverified message or rumor. Following staff to an outdoor location describes evacuation procedure, a different response used when a safe path away from danger exists.

Concept Tested: School Shooting Preparedness

8. A dating relationship starts with occasional location-sharing "just this once," which gradually becomes an expectation, and eventually becomes a demand for the partner's phone password. What does this sequence illustrate?

  1. A healthy relationship building trust over time
  2. Boundary erosion through gradual normalization, where each small step feels reasonable in isolation but the cumulative effect is a loss of independence
  3. A pattern with no real relationship significance
  4. Evidence that location-sharing should never occur under any circumstances
Show Answer

The correct answer is B. The chapter describes boundary erosion as a gradual process: a boundary rarely disappears all at once, but erodes step by step as each small request feels reasonable on its own, even though the cumulative effect is a genuine loss of independence. This matches the specific sequence from occasional sharing to a password demand.

Concept Tested: Social Media Effects On Boundaries

9. Why does the chapter suggest that threat assessment teams are associated with better outcomes than purely punitive responses to reported concerns?

  1. Because punitive responses are always faster to implement
  2. Because most reported concerns are resolved through support rather than discipline alone, according to research cited in the chapter
  3. Because threat assessment teams have no connection to school counselors
  4. Because punishment has been proven more effective in every studied case
Show Answer

The correct answer is B. The chapter states that research associates threat assessment teams, which evaluate reported concerns in a structured way, with better outcomes than purely punitive responses, because most reported concerns are resolved through support rather than discipline alone. This reflects a systems-level evaluation of what actually works in school safety.

Concept Tested: School Safety Practices Evaluation

10. A school invests heavily in a metal detector at the main entrance but does not invest in building relationships between students and staff. Evaluating this choice against the chapter's discussion of school safety research, what is the strongest critique?

  1. Metal detectors are the single most effective safety measure and no other investment is needed
  2. Relational trust has no connection to whether students report concerns to adults
  3. A single visible measure does not automatically make a school safer, since some of the strongest research findings point to relational trust as safety infrastructure, since students are more likely to report concerns to adults they trust
  4. Any physical security measure should always be prioritized over staff relationships
Show Answer

The correct answer is C. The chapter explicitly cautions against assuming a single visible measure like a metal detector automatically makes a school safer, and highlights that some of the strongest research findings point to relational trust: students are more likely to report a concern to an adult they already trust. This makes relationship-building practices safety infrastructure, not just a nice addition.

Concept Tested: School Safety Practices Evaluation