Skip to content

Quiz: Health Decision-Making and Goal-Setting

Test your understanding of the DECIDE decision-making model and structured goal-setting with these review questions.

1. What do the six letters of the DECIDE framework stand for?

  1. Decide, Evaluate, Consider, Identify, Define, Explore, in that fixed order every time
  2. Discuss, Evaluate, Compare, Include, Decide, Execute
  3. Define, Explore, Consider, Identify, Decide, Evaluate
  4. Determine, Examine, Choose, Implement, Document, Explain
Show Answer

The correct answer is C. The chapter's six-step framework is Define the decision, Explore the realistic options, Consider the consequences of each option, Identify the healthiest option, Decide and act, and Evaluate the outcome, in that order.

Concept Tested: Health Decisions And Personal Wellbeing

2. Why does the chapter insist on evaluating the process of a decision separately from its outcome?

  1. Because a well-reasoned decision can turn out badly by chance, and a poorly reasoned decision can turn out fine by luck, so judging only by outcome can teach the wrong lesson
  2. Because outcomes are always a perfectly reliable measure of decision quality
  3. Because process quality and outcome quality are always identical
  4. Because evaluating outcomes is unnecessary once a decision has been made
Show Answer

The correct answer is A. The chapter explains that a well-reasoned decision can still turn out badly by chance, while a poorly reasoned decision can turn out fine by luck. Evaluating the process, not just the result, is what actually improves future decisions, since judging only by outcome risks concluding "it worked out, so it must have been fine."

Concept Tested: Evaluating Health Decision Outcomes

3. How does the chapter distinguish a "supported" goal-setting process from a "collaborative" one?

  1. Supported and collaborative processes are identical and can be used interchangeably
  2. A collaborative process never involves another person's expertise or input
  3. A supported process always requires two or more people to jointly own the outcome
  4. In a supported process, the goal still belongs primarily to one person who borrows expertise or accountability, while a collaborative process involves joint ownership of both the plan and the outcome by two or more people
Show Answer

The correct answer is D. The chapter distinguishes these clearly: a supported process means a person keeps ownership of the goal while involving someone with more expertise or accountability, such as a coach or counselor, while a collaborative process means two or more people jointly own both the plan and the outcome of a shared goal.

Concept Tested: Supported Goal-Setting Process

4. Maya frames her decision as "should I be rude to my friend?" instead of "how do I get home safely tonight?" What does the chapter say about this framing choice?

  1. Both framings are equally accurate and lead to the same set of options
  2. Naming the decision accurately changes which options even occur to a person, and framing it around rudeness rather than safety can make refusing feel unkind, obscuring the real decision
  3. The framing of a decision has no effect on which options are considered
  4. Rudeness is always the most important factor in a safety-related decision
Show Answer

The correct answer is B. The chapter states that Maya's real decision is "how do I get home safely tonight?" not "should I be rude to my friend?" and that naming the decision accurately changes which options even occur to a person. A precise definition also separates the decision from the emotions surrounding it.

Concept Tested: Health Decisions And Personal Wellbeing

5. Why does the chapter warn against narrowing a decision to just two choices too early, such as "get in the car or ruin the friendship"?

  1. Because only two options ever actually exist in any real decision
  2. Because premature judgment can quietly delete a genuinely good option before it is fairly considered, so options should be listed fully before being judged
  3. Because generating more options always makes a decision harder to justify
  4. Because the Explore step of DECIDE should be skipped whenever a decision feels urgent
Show Answer

The correct answer is B. The chapter identifies narrowing to just two choices too early as a common decision-making failure. Premature judgment, such as worrying "Mom will be mad," can quietly delete a genuinely good option before it is fairly considered, which is why the Explore step calls for generating a realistic range of options before evaluating any of them.

Concept Tested: Evaluating Options In Health Decisions

6. A student writes the goal "I will be in bed with lights off by 11:00 p.m. on school nights, checked by my own phone's screen-time log, for the next four weeks," instead of "I want to sleep better." What does this change demonstrate?

  1. Formulating a SMART goal — specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound — which is far easier to evaluate later than a vague intention
  2. A goal that has become less measurable than before
  3. An example of the collaborative goal-setting process
  4. A goal focused entirely on community wellbeing rather than personal wellbeing
Show Answer

The correct answer is A. The chapter contrasts the vague goal "I want to sleep better" with a SMART version that specifies a concrete time, a tracking method, and a duration. A goal stated this way is far easier to evaluate later than a vague intention, supporting the individual goal-setting process described in the chapter.

Concept Tested: Individual Goal-Setting Process

7. Maya's driving friend sees the ride offer as a normal favor and feels hurt by a refusal, while Maya's parents see the same night through a safety-first lens. What does the chapter say about handling these different perspectives?

  1. Only the parents' perspective is ever valid in a health decision
  2. Taking multiple perspectives seriously does not mean satisfying everyone; it means checking your reasoning against viewpoints you might otherwise ignore, which can reveal blind spots, and in health decisions safety concerns generally outweigh social comfort
  3. All perspectives must be treated as equally decisive regardless of the stakes involved
  4. The friend's perspective should always be prioritized to preserve the relationship
Show Answer

The correct answer is B. The chapter explains that none of these perspectives is simply "wrong," but taking them seriously does not require satisfying everyone. It means checking reasoning against viewpoints that might otherwise be ignored, and notes that in health decisions, safety concerns generally outweigh social comfort.

Concept Tested: Multiple Perspectives On Health Decisions

8. In her justification, Maya says, "I still value our friendship — that's actually why I texted you not to drive either," after explaining why she chose not to ride with her friend. What does this specific structure accomplish?

  1. It has no real effect on how the refusal is likely to be received
  2. It reverses her decision by suggesting she might still ride with her friend later
  3. It separates the decision from the relationship, which prevents the refusal from being misread as a rejection of the friendship itself
  4. It removes the need to state any evidence or reasoning behind the choice
Show Answer

The correct answer is C. The chapter highlights that a strong justification states the reasoning, cites the relevant fact, and separates the decision from the relationship, which prevents the refusal from being misread as rejection. This structure often reduces the very social friction people fear when making a harder, healthier choice.

Concept Tested: Justifying Health Choices

9. A student decides not to wear a helmet while biking to save time, and nothing bad happens that day. Evaluating this decision using the chapter's process-versus-outcome distinction, was it a good decision?

  1. Yes, because no negative outcome occurred, proving the decision was reasonable
  2. The question cannot be evaluated without knowing the exact probability of a crash that day
  3. No, because the decision carried real risk regardless of that day's result, and a good outcome from a risky process is luck, not evidence the process was sound
  4. Yes, because saving time is always the most important factor in a safety decision
Show Answer

The correct answer is C. The chapter's own quick-check example addresses this exact scenario: the decision carried real risk regardless of that day's outcome, and a good outcome from a risky process is luck, not evidence that the process itself was sound. Evaluating decisions requires judging the reasoning, not just whether things happened to turn out fine.

Concept Tested: Evaluating Health Decision Outcomes

10. A four-week sleep goal only partially succeeded — bedtime improved by 45 minutes instead of the full hour — but the checkpoint log clearly revealed that the weekend schedule was the specific barrier undermining full success. Evaluating this outcome using the chapter's framework, what is the strongest conclusion?

  1. The goal-setting process was a failure because the exact target wasn't reached
  2. Partial achievement always indicates a poorly designed strategy, regardless of what was learned
  3. The outcome cannot be evaluated at all without achieving the goal completely
  4. The goal-setting process was excellent even though the goal was only partially achieved, since the checkpoint data was tracked, revealed exactly which barrier needs a better strategy, and provides clear direction for revision
Show Answer

The correct answer is D. The chapter explicitly gives this example: a goal can be only partially achieved through an excellent process, revealing exactly which barrier needs a better strategy next time. Evaluation should examine whether checkpoint data was tracked and whether strategy components functioned as intended, not just whether the exact target number was hit.

Concept Tested: Evaluating Goal Strategy Outcomes