Skip to content

AI Hype Cycle with Mythical Beasts

Run the AI Hype Cycle with Mythical Beasts MicroSim Fullscreen
Edit in the p5.js Editor

About This MicroSim

This MicroSim maps eight AI technologies onto the classic hype cycle curve and assigns a mythical beast to each of the five phases — not as decoration, but as a mnemonic classification system that the broader textbook depends upon. Pegasus marks the Technology Trigger, where something new takes flight on the strength of possibility alone. The Unicorn occupies the Peak of Inflated Expectations, where valuation exceeds any conceivable evidence. The Dragon guards the Trough of Disillusionment, where fire has cleared away the hype and only rubble remains. The Centaur stands on the Slope of Enlightenment, where human judgment and machine capability are learning to work together without one attempting to replace the other. The Phoenix anchors the Plateau of Productivity, reborn into something that is actually useful and, consequently, no longer discussed at conferences.

The eight technologies plotted on the curve — ranging from AGI at the peak to spam filters at the plateau — represent a deliberate spread across all five phases. Students are asked to evaluate each technology's position independently before revealing the expert placement. This is not because expert placement is correct. It is because comparing your assessment to expert consensus is more instructive than passively accepting a diagram, and because the gap between the two is itself a data point worth examining.

The drag-to-position interaction is the pedagogical mechanism: it forces a commitment before the answer is revealed. Students who skip straight to "Show Expert Placement" are welcome to do so. The literature suggests they will remember less. The literature is, in this case, probably right.

How to Use

Hover over any beast icon on the curve to read a brief description of the phase it represents and its allegorical meaning. Hover over any technology marker to see a detail card explaining why it is plotted at its default position. To reposition a technology, click and drag its marker along the curve to where you believe it belongs. When you have placed all eight technologies, click Show Expert Placement to reveal the consensus positions and Compare My Answers to see how far each of your placements diverged. Click Reset to return all markers to their default positions and begin again.

Iframe Embed Code

You can add this MicroSim to any web page by adding this to your HTML:

1
2
3
4
<iframe src="https://dmccreary.github.io/unicorns/sims/ai-hype-cycle-beasts/main.html"
        height="450px"
        width="100%"
        scrolling="no"></iframe>

Lesson Plan

Grade Level

9-12 (High School)

Duration

10-15 minutes

Prerequisites

  • Familiarity with the five mythical beast archetypes introduced in Chapter 2 (Pegasus, Unicorn, Dragon, Centaur, Phoenix)
  • Basic awareness that AI technologies exist at different stages of maturity, even if the press releases do not acknowledge this
  • No prior knowledge of Gartner's hype cycle is required, though students who have encountered it will find the beast allegories a more memorable framework

Activities

  1. Exploration (5 min): Hover over each beast icon and read the phase description. Then hover over each technology marker without moving anything. Note which technologies you feel confident placing and which you are uncertain about.
  2. Guided Practice (5 min): Drag all eight technology markers to where you believe they belong on the curve. Try to place at least one technology in each phase. When finished, click "Show Expert Placement" and note which of your placements diverged most significantly from the consensus.
  3. Assessment (5 min): Choose the technology whose expert placement surprised you most. Write two sentences explaining why you placed it where you did and what the expert placement suggests about the difference between media coverage and actual maturity.

Assessment

  • The student can correctly name all five hype cycle phases and identify which mythical beast represents each one, without referring to the simulation.
  • The student can explain, in their own words, why a technology at the Peak of Inflated Expectations is represented by a Unicorn rather than a Phoenix — that is, they can articulate the distinction between "mythically valued" and "actually reborn as useful."
  • The student can describe one specific technology from the simulation and construct a one-paragraph argument for why it belongs in the phase they assigned it.

References

  1. Gartner Research Group (2023). Hype Cycle for Artificial Intelligence: A Framework for Evaluating Technology Maturity Without Mentioning the Word "Bubble". Gartner Technical Report GG-2023-AI-447.
  2. Fenn, J. & Raskino, M. (2020). Mastering the Hype Cycle: How to Choose the Right Innovation at the Right Time, Assuming You Have Access to the Right Analysts. Harvard Business Review Press.
  3. Okonkwo, T. & Reinholt, S. (2024). Allegorical Frameworks in Technology Literacy Education: Mythical Beasts as Pedagogical Anchors for the Hype Cycle. Journal of Technology and Society, 22(1), 67–84.

Instructional Design Commentary

A competent instructional designer would have noted that the hype cycle is a proprietary framework invented by a market research firm whose primary revenue stream is advising companies on which technologies to adopt, and that using this framework as an educational tool therefore introduces a mild conflict of interest that a learner analysis might have surfaced. A competent instructional designer would have recommended replacing it with a more neutral classification scheme, then spent six weeks developing one, then presented it to a committee that found it "too abstract" and asked for a hype cycle metaphor instead.

The mythical beast allegories were added to this simulation because a prior version of the content — a plain labeled diagram with five phases and eight dots — tested poorly with focus groups, who described it as "forgettable." The beasts tested well. The lesson here is either that human memory is more responsive to narrative than to taxonomies, or that people like pictures of dragons. The instructional designer on a proper project would have written a report distinguishing between these two explanations. This textbook does not have an instructional designer. You are reading the report.