Skip to content

Hype Cycle Journey Interactive Timeline

Run the Hype Cycle Journey Interactive Timeline MicroSim Fullscreen
Edit in the p5.js Editor

About This MicroSim

This MicroSim follows a deer through all five phases of the technology hype cycle, presenting concrete headlines, funding data, and behavioral descriptions at each stage. The deer, as regular readers of this textbook will recognize, is not merely a deer. The deer is anyone who has ever attended an all-hands meeting in which a senior executive announced that AI would transform the company "within 18 months" and then stood frozen at the podium, believing the headlights were the sun.

The five phases proceed from Technology Trigger through Peak of Inflated Expectations, Trough of Disillusionment, Slope of Enlightenment, and Plateau of Productivity. At each phase, scholars observe the headlines circulating in the media, the corresponding funding activity, and a precise description of what a deer standing in that phase of the road would be experiencing, psychologically speaking. The framework was originally developed by Gartner, which is a real organization, and the deer was added by this textbook, which is not entirely a real textbook. This distinction is itself a lesson.

By Phase 5, the deer has crossed the road safely. The technologies that survived — spam filters, spell check, search ranking — are boring in the way that running water is boring. They work. They are not the subject of press releases. Nobody is raising a Series C to improve autocorrect. This is what success looks like, and it looks nothing like a keynote.

How to Use

  1. The simulation opens at Phase 1 (Technology Trigger). Read the headlines, observe the funding data, and note the deer's behavioral description in the bottom panel.
  2. Click Next Phase to advance to the next stage of the hype cycle. The highlighted marker on the curve at the top of the display will move to indicate the current phase.
  3. Click Previous Phase to return to the prior phase for comparison.
  4. Click Reset to return to Phase 1 and begin again.
  5. At each phase, before advancing, attempt to predict what the headlines and deer behavior at the next phase will look like. The hype cycle is consistent enough that prediction is possible. This is also, incidentally, the point.

Iframe Embed Code

You can add this MicroSim to any web page by adding this to your HTML:

1
2
3
4
<iframe src="https://dmccreary.github.io/unicorns/sims/hype-cycle-journey/main.html"
        height="450px"
        width="100%"
        scrolling="no"></iframe>

Lesson Plan

Grade Level

9-12 (High School)

Duration

10-15 minutes

Prerequisites

  • Basic familiarity with the concept of technology adoption curves
  • Having read at least one tech headline in the past 24 months, which is sufficient to provide prior knowledge for all five phases simultaneously
  • An understanding that "deer in headlights" is both a metaphor and, in this textbook, a formal allegorical category representing human paralysis in the face of technological disruption

Activities

  1. Exploration (5 min): Step through all five phases without stopping. Observe the headlines at Phase 2 carefully — note which ones you have personally read or believed at the time of reading. Make a mental note. Do not share this information unless you are comfortable doing so.
  2. Guided Practice (5 min): Return to Phase 3 (Trough of Disillusionment) and Phase 4 (Slope of Enlightenment). Compare the headlines at both phases for the same technology category. Write down one specific difference between how a technology is described in each phase, beyond the obvious shift in tone.
  3. Assessment (5 min): Without referring to the simulation, describe in two to three sentences what the "deer in headlights" allegory reveals about institutional responses to technology at the Peak of Inflated Expectations that the phrase "hype cycle" alone does not capture.

Assessment

  • The scholar can correctly describe the defining characteristic of each of the five phases using the simulation's headline and funding data as evidence, rather than relying solely on the phase name.
  • The scholar can explain why Phase 5 (Plateau of Productivity) features technologies that do not appear in mainstream tech coverage, and what this absence reveals about the relationship between media attention and actual technological utility.
  • The scholar can identify at least one current technology that they believe is presently in Phase 2, and defend that placement with reference to observable evidence such as funding announcements, press release frequency, or the number of LinkedIn posts describing it as "the future."

References

  1. Gartner, Inc. (2023). Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies. Gartner Research. (Cited because it is real, which in this textbook is worth noting.)
  2. Hollenbeck, M. F., & Treadwell, C. (2022). Paralysis as pedagogy: What the deer-in-headlights response reveals about organizational learning during technology transitions. Journal of Applied Allegorical Management, 9(1), 14–29.
  3. Vance, R. L. (2024). From dazzle to plateau: A longitudinal analysis of media coverage patterns across seventeen technology hype cycles, 2005–2024. Proceedings of the Society for Taking Obvious Things Seriously, 3, 77–91.

Instructional Design Commentary

A competent instructional designer would have begun this project by mapping the hype cycle content to a formal learning taxonomy before selecting an interactive format, then tested whether a step-through narrative simulation was actually the most effective modality for Understand-level learning objectives, given the substantial evidence that simple well-written text achieves equivalent outcomes at a fraction of the development cost. They would then have probably built the simulation anyway, because interactive equals engaging equals funded, and that chain of logic is itself a small private hype cycle that the ed-tech industry completed in 2011 and has not revisited since.

The deer metaphor deserves particular instructional design scrutiny. Using a woodland ungulate as the persistent narrative character across a five-phase technological framework is an unusual pedagogical choice that a formal design review process would almost certainly flag for revision. It is also the most memorable thing about this lesson, which suggests that the formal design review process may be the deer, and the deer may be standing in the road.