Claims Clearinghouse and Eligibility Verification Workflow
Description
Adjudication gets the attention, but it is one box in a longer chain. Before the visit, the front desk asks the payer a real-time question and gets back the member's current deductible and out-of-pocket balances. After the visit, a coded claim travels through a clearinghouse, is adjudicated, updates those same balances, and returns as a machine-postable remittance advice. The dashed arrow from step 7 back to step 3 is the whole argument of the diagram: the benefit accumulator is shared state, so a cost estimate given in the morning can be wrong by the afternoon through no error by anyone. Use the swimlane buttons to isolate either half, or Follow the accumulator to see just the loop.
Lesson Plan
Audience: undergraduate students and healthcare data practitioners. Allow 10-15 minutes. Prerequisites: the claim adjudication pipeline, and the Member-Policy-BenefitPlan-Coverage graph pattern.
Learning objective: Given the administrative claims infrastructure workflow, the learner can explain the role of a clearinghouse, an ERA, and eligibility verification, and summarize how the benefit accumulator connects to each.
- Explore: View Before the Visit alone and note that no document is exchanged -- only a question and an answer. Then view After the Visit and count how many of those five steps produce or transform a document.
- Explain: Select step 5, then step 6. Explain why a clearinghouse rejection is cheaper for a provider than a payer denial, even though both mean the claim was not paid on first submission.
- Transfer: A patient is quoted $340 at check-in and billed $520 six weeks later, with no change in what was done. Using the dashed arrow, give one explanation that involves no error by anyone. Name the assumption your explanation depends on.
Assessment: use the Transfer prompt as an exit ticket. A complete response traces the accumulator from step 7 to step 3, distinguishes a stale estimate from an incorrect one, and names the timing assumption explicitly.
Embed This MicroSim
Copy this iframe to your website:
1 | |
Quality Checks
Validated September 8, 2026. Completeness rubric: 100/100, scored with the project's calculate-quality-score.py against the standardization checklist. Checked automatically in a browser at 400, 800, and 1200 px: the page loads with no JavaScript errors, no interactive control is clipped outside the viewport, and the document does not scroll horizontally. Controls, selections, and the reset path were exercised by hand during development at desktop width. The page reports its own height to the parent document, so the declared iframe height above serves only as a fallback.
Specification
The full specification below is extracted from Chapter 15: Reimbursement, Health Plan Types, and Payer Contracts.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 | |
Related Resources
References
- Source chapter — supplied the learning objective and the worked example.
- Mermaid flowchart documentation — subgraphs, click directives, and class styling (accessed September 8, 2026).
- Wikipedia: Clearing house (finance) — the general intermediary pattern this workflow instantiates.
- CMS: Electronic transactions and HIPAA administrative simplification — background on the standardized X12 transaction sets (accessed September 8, 2026).