title: Predictive Model Performance: Traditional vs Graph-Based description: Interactive Chart.js MicroSim for predictive model performance: traditional vs graph-based. image: /sims/predictive-model-performance-traditional-graph-based/predictive-model-performance-traditional-graph-based.png og:image: /sims/predictive-model-performance-traditional-graph-based/predictive-model-performance-traditional-graph-based.png twitter:image: /sims/predictive-model-performance-traditional-graph-based/predictive-model-performance-traditional-graph-based.png social: cards: false quality_score: 0
Predictive Model Performance: Traditional vs Graph-Based
Run the Predictive Model Performance: Traditional vs Graph-Based MicroSim Fullscreen
About This MicroSim
This line chart compares how three model families predict 30-day hospital readmission as the training dataset grows from 100 to 1,000,000 patient records (log scale). Traditional Logistic Regression and Random Forest improve quickly but plateau (around 0.78 and 0.83 AUROC), while the Graph Neural Network keeps climbing past 0.93 because it can exploit relational context. A dashed line marks random-chance performance (0.50).
How to Use
Hover over any point to see the model, its AUROC, and the 95% confidence interval at that training size. Compare the three curves to see where the graph-based model overtakes the traditional methods and how its advantage widens with more data, especially beyond a typical single-hospital dataset (~10,000 patients).
Iframe Embed Code
You can add this MicroSim to any web page by adding this to your HTML:
1 2 3 4 | |
Lesson Plan
Grade Level
9-12 (High School Geometry)
Duration
10-15 minutes
Prerequisites
TODO: List prerequisites.
Activities
- Exploration (5 min): TODO
- Guided Practice (5 min): TODO
- Assessment (5 min): TODO
Assessment
TODO: List assessment criteria.
References
- TODO: Add references.